Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Reasons for Decisions:
The available evidence shows, on balance, that the claimed
right of way is reasonably alleged to subsist;
There is a conflict in evidence. The
publication of the Order will provide a further opportunity for additional
evidence to be submitted and considered against the legal test for
confirmation;
If the evidence shows, on balance, that the
route should be recorded as a footpath, and there are no outstanding
objections, the Council can itself confirm the Order without submission to the
Planning Inspectorate.
Decisions
on applications for definitive map modification orders ensure that changes to
the network of public rights of way comply with the legal requirements.
Alternative options considered and
rejected:
None
That
a)
The application be accepted
and an order made to modify the definitive map and statement of rights of way
by
adding a footpath from Point A to Point G as shown on
Drawing14/28/1;
b)
Evidence received following publication of the
order be considered prior to confirmation;
c) If the legal test for confirmation is met and the Order is unopposed, or if all objections are withdrawn, it be confirmed by the Council.
Publication date: 02/12/2019
Date of decision: 04/10/2019