Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Decision
Agreed that a single scrutiny panel for
the COVID-19 response would be the most appropriate option at this time
The delegation for this decision is
detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution
Reason for Decision
This enables
officers to balance their time between the active emergency response to
COVID-19 and their responsibility to provide assurance.
Alternative options
included holding more than one scrutiny panel
Officer
Delegated Decision
Date: 8 April
2020
|
|
Decision: Agreed that a single scrutiny panel
for the COVID-19 response would be the most appropriate option at this time The delegation for this decision is
detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution |
|
Key Decision: Yes |
|
Reason(s) for Decisions: This enables
officers to balance their time between the active emergency response to
COVID-19 and their responsibility to provide assurance. |
|
Decision Maker (Name
and Title): Jonathan Mair,
Corporate Director for Legal and Democratic and the Senior Leadership Team |
Alternative options considered
and rejected:
Alternative
options included holding more than one scrutiny panel |
|
Any conflict
of interest declared by any member consulted: None |
|
Any dispensation granted in respect of any
declared conflict of interest: None |
Publication date: 29/05/2020
Date of decision: 08/04/2020