Member Engagement in Task and Finish Groups / Work Streams
A discussion with regard to member engagement in
the Shadow Dorset Council Task and Finish Groups and Workstreams,
with the Lead Member and Officer for Member Engagement.
Minutes:
The
Chairman welcomed the Lead Member and Officer for Member Engagement who had
been invited to the meeting to talk with members about member engagement in the
Shadow Dorset Council task and finish groups and workstreams. The Lead Member, Councillor G Carr-Jones
indicated that he was happy to answer any questions that members had related to
this area.
Members
considered the issues in this area and during discussion the following points
were raised:
·
The group had been set up to look at issues around member engagement in
the Shaping Dorset Council programme and included representatives from each of
the six councils. The decision had been
taken that electronic communications would be used including members receiving
a newsletter by email and a full range of information being included on the Sharepoint site. Use
of Sharepoint by members had been monitored and it
was noted that only 43 members had logged into the site. In addition, monthly briefing sessions for
members had been held. Numbers attending
the briefings appeared to be declining although attempts had been made to hold
sessions at various times, including in the evening
·
A discussion was held in respect of the difference between member
engagement and member involvement. Some
members felt that they were not involved in the Shadow Council arrangements
although it was recognised that it was difficult for everyone to be involved
·
Councillor Carr-Jones noted that he was happy to receive feedback on
ways that the wider councillor membership could be best engaged
·
Consideration was being given to the use of ModGov
for the various meetings being held
·
A point was raised that there were some issues with members not
attending meetings and not sending their apologies in advance, including with
this committee. The Chairman indicated
that she would review the position with members attending meetings of this
committee
·
There needed to be a good system where members were able to self serve
in terms of finding out the information they needed
·
A discussion was held in respect of the arrangements for the member
briefings and in response to a point raised, Councillor Carr-Jones noted that
these needed to continue to be held as sessions for all members as it was not
practical for six separate sovereign sessions to be held. In addition it was seen as useful for members
of the six councils to have opportunities to meet together and hear each others
points
·
A point was raised with regard to the Shadow Council meetings and that
the opportunity to have presentations and discussion at the meetings would be
welcomed
·
In respect of information on people responsible for different areas,
information would be included in the next newsletter
·
A point was raised that some members were not thinking forward to the
new council arrangements and that opportunities were being provided for them to
engage with the process. There was a role
for sovereign members to encourage other members to participate
· It was noted that there would be some members who did not want to ... view the full minutes text for item 42