Agenda and minutes

Place and Resources Scrutiny Committee - Thursday, 30th March, 2023 10.00 am

Venue: Council Chamber, County Hall, Dorchester, DT1 1XJ. View directions

Contact: Lindsey Watson  01305 252209 / Email: lindsey.watson@dorsetcouncil.gov.uk

Media

Items
No. Item

70.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 165 KB

To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 26 January 2023.

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 26 January 2023 were confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

71.

Declarations of interest

To disclose any pecuniary, other registrable or non-registrable interests as set out in the adopted Code of Conduct. In making their disclosure councillors are asked to state the agenda item, the nature of the interest and any action they propose to take as part of their declaration.

 

If required, further advice should be sought from the Monitoring Officer in advance of the meeting.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest.

72.

Chairman's Update

To receive any updates from the Chairman of the Place and Resources Scrutiny Committee.

Minutes:

There were no updates from the Chairman on this occasion.

73.

Public Participation

Representatives of town or parish councils and members of the public who live, work or represent an organisation within the Dorset Council area are welcome to submit up to two questions or two statements for each meeting.  Alternatively, you could submit one question and one statement for each meeting.  

 

All submissions must be emailed in full to lindsey.watson@dorsetcouncil.gov.uk by 8.30am on 27 March 2023.  

 

When submitting your question(s) and/or statement(s) please note that: 

 

·            no more than three minutes will be allowed for any one question or statement to be asked/read  

·            a question may include a short pre-amble to set the context and this will be included within the three minute period 

·            please note that sub divided questions count towards your total of two 

·            when submitting a question please indicate who the question is for (e.g. the name of the committee or Portfolio Holder) 

·            Include your name, address and contact details.  Only your name will be published but we may need your other details to contact you about your question or statement in advance of the meeting. 

·            questions and statements received in line with the council’s rules for public participation will be published as a supplement to the agenda 

·            all questions, statements and responses will be published in full within the minutes of the meeting.

 

Dorset Council Constitution Procedure Rule 9 

Minutes:

There were no questions or statements from members of the public or local organisations.

74.

Questions from Councillors

To receive questions submitted by councillors.  

 

Councillors can submit up to two valid questions at each meeting and sub divided questions count towards this total.   Questions and statements received will be published as a supplement to the agenda and all questions, statements and responses will be published in full within the minutes of the meeting. 

 

The submissions must be emailed in full to lindsey.watson@dorsetcouncil.gov.uk by 8.30am 27 March 2023.

 

Dorset Council Constitution – Procedure Rule 13

Minutes:

There were no questions from councillors.

75.

Commercialisation Transformation Programme pdf icon PDF 217 KB

To consider a report of the Service Manager Commercial and Procurement.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The committee received and considered a report and presentation of the Service Manager Commercial and Procurement, which expanded on a report received by the committee in November 2023 regarding the Commercialisation Transformation Programme – “Being more commercially minded”.  The report provided further detail and assurance on how the programme had set out a corporate approach to contract management to ensure that the Council maximised commercial opportunities and secured optimum value for money in the delivery of goods, services and works.

 

M Roberts declared an interest as a supplier to Dorset Council Adult Services in his own right and also as Chairman of the Southern Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority, who used procurement services in Dorset Council.  Following advice from the Monitoring Officer, M Roberts confirmed that as he would not be going into the detail of specific contracts, he would remain in the meeting and take part in the discussion.

 

P Brown indicated that his employer had a contract with Dorset Council but confirmed that given the advice provided by the Monitoring Officer at the meeting, he did not consider his interest to be pecuniary.

 

Councillors considered the issues arising from the report and during discussion, points were raised in the following areas:

 

·       How the Council supported and encouraged local businesses, including small and medium enterprises, to submit tenders for business with the Council and how contracts could be arranged to encourage tenders from smaller companies

·       The management of leverage contracts

·       Work undertaken at the pre-contract stage, setting of selection criteria including social criteria, benchmarking and due diligence in order to get the best outcome

·       The training available and upskilling of officers in procurement and contract management

·       Discussions around outsourcing services and bringing services back in house would be considered as part of the contract management process

·       The implications of the Procurement Bill which was currently being debated in the House of Commons including any potential impact on capacity within the Council

·       Collaborative working being undertaken with other organisations.

 

The Chairman provided a summary of the points raised and further action required:

 

·       The Council was considered a role model in terms of contract management and paid suppliers promptly

·       There was a flexible approach within the Council in terms of how contracts were dealt with

·       Shared learning was being undertaken across Council areas

·       There was a willingness to work with other councils to get best value for Dorset and to seek quality services

·       The implications of the new Procurement Bill were noted and the potential impact on capacity in the area

·       The measurement of success was ensuring a positive culture of being commercial and good contract management within the Council

·       A further update could be provided to the committee at an appropriate time.

76.

Implementation review of the Household Recycling Centre (HRC) Vehicle Access Policy pdf icon PDF 268 KB

To consider a report of the Head of Commercial Waste and Strategy.

Minutes:

The committee considered a report of the Head of Commercial Waste and Strategy which provided information on the implementation of the updated Household Recycling Centre vehicle access policy since its introduction in May 2022.  The report invited the committee to consider if further review of any elements of the policy was required.  Detail of comments received on the revised policy was included as an appendix to the report.

 

The committee considered the information provided and discussion was focused in the following areas:

 

·       The clarification of the policy was welcomed and a request made for information to be provided to all Dorset Council councillors and also to town and parish councils through the Dorset Association for Parish and Town Councils (DAPTC)

·       Many issues and enquiries had been addressed through discussion with individuals and all formal complaints had been resolved

·       It was noted that there had been no noticeable increase in fly tipping as a direct result of the policy

·       The availability of the garden waste collection service was discussed

·       Issues around cross border arrangements were considered

·       The policy was considered to be lawful with the restrictions on vehicles supported through rational justification.

 

At the conclusion of the discussion, a summary of the points raised and further action required was provided:

 

·       It was noted that if complaint levels were low and the situation with fly tipping was not getting worse, the policy could be deemed to be working and no further review was required at this stage

·       A briefing note would be provided to all councillors and the DAPTC

·       Assurance had been provided around the use of dual cab pick up vehicles

·       Formal complaints had been resolved

·       The policy was flexible and reasonable and conversations could be held with individuals to address specific issues

·       Councillors were content with how cross border access issues were dealt with

·       An assurance had been received that the policy was lawful

·       A further update on the policy could be provided to the committee in February 2024 and the Chairman of the committee would discuss the issue of fly tipping and a potential future report, with the Chairman of the Place and Resources Overview Committee.

77.

Bus Service Improvement Plan 2022 update pdf icon PDF 143 KB

To consider a report of the Head of Dorset Travel.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The committee received a report of the Head of Dorset Travel, which invited comments on the refreshed Bus Service Improvement Plan (BSIP) and feedback on the short-term delivery programme through to 2024/25.

 

Councillors considered the issues arising from the report and during discussion, points were noted in the following areas:

 

·       The position with bus services and connection into the public transport network in Maiden Newton, St Leonards and Alderholt were considered.  Discussion with ward members could be held after the meeting where relevant

·       Publicity of available services was a key theme of the BSIP and in addition, it was noted that parishes were good at publicising what was available in their villages

·       The plan set out the aspiration to improve access to bus services but it was noted that without government funding, action was limited to goals that could be achieved through existing funding streams and greater partnership working

·       There was regular engagement with key stakeholders and bus users

·       The impact of Covid-19 of bus usage was noted.

 

At this point in the meeting, it was proposed by B Goringe seconded by M Roberts and agreed by the committee, that the meeting continue beyond the 3-hour limit as set out in the Constitution.

 

Discussion continued with points raised in the following areas:

 

·       The Portfolio Holder noted frustration with the current position, thanked the committee for the questions asked and noted potential future actions to consider the issues in this area

·       The plan set out two programmes – one that could be achieved with additional funding and one through existing resources

·       Links to the concessionary bus pass scheme were considered

·       Engagement with other councils was undertaken

·       The involvement of town and parish councils was considered.

 

At the end of the discussion a summary of the points raised and further action required was provided:

 

·       Due to the funding position, the short term delivery programme was focused on providing better services using existing resources

·       Recognition of the aspiration to achieve funding in future for transformation work

·       Ongoing engagement was undertaken with stakeholders and bus users to provide updates and understand customer expectations and with rail operators around connections between rail and bus services

·       The report to highlight the potential implications for children and young adults living in rural communities

·       A request to explore opportunities for town and parish councils funding and providing bus services for their area

·       Recognition of the impact of Covid-19 on bus passenger numbers

·       Opportunities for councillors to consider the issues, potentially through a cross-party group.

 

The committee noted the points raised by the Portfolio Holder and both supported and requested that the Portfolio Holder made further representations to Government in relation to the Council’s unsuccessful bid for government bus transformation funding and the current position in respect of the delivery of the Bus Service Improvement Plan.

78.

Transforming Cities Fund update pdf icon PDF 155 KB

To consider a report of the Transport Planning Team Leader.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The committee considered a report of the Transport Planning Team Leader, which provided information on progress to date regarding the Department for Transport based Transforming Cities Fund (TCF) award and invited questions and comments in respect of the remaining programme.

 

Councillors discussed the information contained in the report and particular comments were made in respect of the Beryl Bike scheme and the need to review the location of some of the parking bays and the funding connected to the programme.

79.

Performance Scrutiny

A review of the relevant Dorset Council performance dashboard to inform the scrutiny committee’s forward plan and identify items for deep dives.

 

The following link is the dashboard for the committee:

 

Place and Resources Scrutiny Committee dashboard

 

Committee members to flag up if any areas for potential review.

 

Operational – Corporate: Councillors Piers Brown, Barry Goringe and  David Shortell

 

Operational – Place: Councillors Mark Roberts, David Tooke and Jon Andrews

 

HR: Councillors Rod Adkins, Andy Canning and Bill Trite

 

The Chairman, Councillor Shane Bartlett, maintains an overview of all the above areas.

Minutes:

The committee considered the performance dashboard and highlighted some areas of interest. These included:

 

·       Performance against targets relating to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests and Subject Access Requests – an update would be provided at the next meeting

·       Short term sickness levels and staff turnover across the Council – a briefing note would be provided for the committee.

80.

Place and Resources Scrutiny Committee Work Programme pdf icon PDF 179 KB

To review the Place and Resources Scrutiny Committee Work Programme.

Minutes:

Councillors reviewed the committee’s forward plan and noted items to be considered at forthcoming meetings.

81.

Cabinet Forward Plan and Decisions pdf icon PDF 368 KB

To review the Cabinet Forward Plan and decisions taken at recent meetings.

 

The Cabinet Forward Plan and decisions of recent meetings are provided to members of the Place & Resources Scrutiny Committee to review and identify any potential post decision scrutiny to be undertaken, by scheduling items into the work programme to review after a period of implementation.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The committee noted the Cabinet Forward Plan and decisions taken at recent meetings, which the committee could use to identify potential areas for post decision review.

82.

Urgent items

To consider any items of business which the Chairman has had prior notification and considers to be urgent pursuant to section 100B (4) b) of the Local Government Act 1972. The reason for the urgency shall be recorded in the minutes.

Minutes:

There were no urgent items.

83.

Exempt Business

To move the exclusion of the press and the public for the following item in view of the likely disclosure of exempt information within the meaning of paragraph x of schedule 12 A to the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended).

 

The public and the press will be asked to leave the meeting whilst the item of business is considered.

 

There is no exempt business.

Minutes:

There was no exempt business.