Venue: Council Chamber, County Hall, Dorchester, DT1 1XJ. View directions
Contact: John Miles Email: john.miles@dorsetcouncil.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies To receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: An apology for absence was received from Roger Ong. |
|
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 9th December 2024. Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 9th December 2024 were confirmed and signed. |
|
Declarations of Interest To disclose any pecuniary, other registrable or non-registrable interest as set out in the adopted Code of Conduct. In making their decision councillors are asked to state the agenda item, the nature of the interest and any action they propose to take as part of their declaration. If required, further advice should be sought from the Monitoring Officer in advance of the meeting. Minutes: No declarations of disclosable pecuniary interests were made at the meeting. |
|
Public Participation Representatives of town or parish councils and members of the public who live, work, or represent an organisation within the Dorset Council area are welcome to submit either 1 question or 1 statement for each meeting. You are welcome to attend the meeting in person or via MS Teams to read out your question and to receive the response. If you submit a statement for the committee this will be circulated to all members of the committee in advance of the meeting as a supplement to the agenda and appended to the minutes for the formal record but will not be read out at the meeting. The first 8 questions and the first 8 statements received from members of the public or organisations for each meeting will be accepted on a first come first served basis in accordance with the deadline set out below. All submissions must be emailed in full to john.miles@dorsetcouncil.gov.uk by 8.30 am on 8th January 2025. When submitting your question or statement please note that: · You can submit 1 question or 1 statement. · A question may include a short pre-amble to set the context. · It must be a single question and any sub-divided questions will not be permitted. · Each question will consist of no more than 450 words, and you will be given up to 3 minutes to present your question. · When submitting a question please indicate who the question is for (e.g., the name of the committee or Portfolio Holder) · Include your name, address, and contact details. Only your name will be published but we may need your other details to contact you about your question or statement in advance of the meeting. · Questions and statements received in line with the council’s rules for public participation will be published as a supplement to the agenda. · All questions, statements and responses will be published in full within the minutes of the meeting. Minutes: There was no public participation. |
|
Minutes of the Audit & Governance Sub-committee To note the minutes of the Audit & Governance Hearing Sub-committee (if any meetings have been held). No Meetings Held. Minutes: No meetings held. |
|
Risk Management Update To receive a report by Chris Swain, Risk Reporting Officer. Minutes: The Risk Reporting Officer introduced the report. He went
through the Overview report and covered the principal risk areas. The principal
risks had been confirmed following the approval of the new Council Plan. He
covered section 1.5, work that had been completed recently, workshops with the
children services extended leadership team and digital place service to share
best practice around risk management architecture. There had been a minor
change to the risk scoring matrix in 1.6 of the report, under likelihood,
certain had been amended to almost certain. Under 1.7, the rolling 12 months
since January 2024, which looked at the progress to do with risk register
compliance. This time last year there was 41% compliance with risk register
updates, and now for a consecutive month at 100% compliance. Members questions and responses: ·
Questioned about cyber security and simulating
cyber-attacks by turning it all off. She enquired about how close the council
was at turning sections off and seeing how it worked and how fast it took to
catch up again. ·
The Executive Director for Corporate Development
responded to members questions. That the council had strengthened and invested
against cyber-attacks and in regard to trials the Council had not got as far as
switching things off but underwent a scenario - what would happen if Microsoft
went down? The operations and incident team and a member of each department was
pulled together and asked what the implications were and how they would manage.
This exercise highlighted vulnerabilities and emphasised the importance of
business continuity and recovery plans that are being worked on. Noted. |
|
September (Period 6) Financial Management Report 2024/25 To receive a report by Sean Cremer, Corporate Director Finance and Commercial. Minutes: The Corporate Director Finance and Commercial introduced the report. The Q2 financial position as of the end of September was slightly delayed coming to this Committee due to sequencing that was set out at the start of the year and as the paper must go to Cabinet first there was a delay. Mid-February the Q3 position would be coming to Audit and Governance. He went through the debt position and presented a quick overview to the Committee. There was an overspend of £13.2 Million on the revenue budgets, this was predominately driven by pressures from people and housing. There were some offsetting savings coming through from Place and Corporate. There was a worsening position on the dedicated schools grant which was a national situation in which Dorset Council was trying to do the best locally and was in negotiations with the Department for Education and what it looked like going forward. Capital spend was £47 million. He referenced para 19.1 of the report which showed the scale of debt raised by the Council and the invoices raised by the Council. £135.6 million of invoices had been raised from 1st April to the end of September. He went through the movement and debt collected on a day-to-day basis, as at the end of the last financial year 23-24, £46 million was outstanding. 71% of that had been collected by the end of the year. Member questions and responses: · Simon Roach questioned the budget for revenue and capital – for revenue since 2019-20, the budget for adult and children’s services had increased by 10% even accounting for inflation, he queried if there was a cultural norm of acceptability of going over budget and what were the consequences for budget holders going over budget, i.e. are there sufficient controls? · The Executive Director for Corporate Development responded that it was difficult to strike a balance between statutory responsibility and look to budget holders to have long term strategic plans to understand the market, market management was crucial, increasing the capacity within the care market and controlling budgets when it is difficult to say no. · Simon Roach queried the controls for the capital programs in flight. Is there any formal follow up of capital programmes to assure ourselves that the benefits (including cost avoidance) were being recorded and delivered post-capital approval? · The Corporate Director Finance and Commercial went through the capital programs to show if there was a benefit and how these might be tracked. Noted. |
|
Information Governance - Update To receive a report by Marc Eyre, Service Manager for Assurance. Minutes: The Service Manager for Assurance introduced the report. The
paper was a 6 monthly follow up requested by the Committee following the
presentation of the Annual Governance Report back in July last year. At that
time, it was recognised that there was quite a challenging action plan to meet
the outcomes of the self-assessment that was undertaken based on an information
compliance office toolkit. During the previous meeting some of the challenges
in meeting information requests time scales and introducing some automations
were discussed. The paper followed up on these issues and highlighted the
progress. He highlighted paragraph 1.5 in the report, that some progress had
been made on the action plan and the pace would increase when the current
recruitment process was complete. He covered section 2 of the report and advised that there
was some focus on Freedom of Information Requests at the Place and Resources
Committee, in which they were concerned about the red reporting. Overall, the
Council was close to the 90% target set by the Information Commissioner. The
areas that generated the most requests Place Directorate and Corporate were
regularly reporting as green. There remained some challenges with Children’s
and Adults Directorates and the team was working with the Directorates to
understand some of the issues. Mandatory training was at 88% but still short of
the 95% that is a mandatory requirement in the NHS Data Security and Protection
Toolkit. A Task and Finish Group had been established to move the compliance
forward and to better understand the areas of non-compliance, what might be the
blockers and offer suggestions around stronger consequences for non-compliance. Member questions and responses: ·
Paragraph 2.2 in 20 months Children’s had only
complied on 4 occasions and had been an ongoing problem for a long time. What
is the underlying issue and why have we not in 20 months found what the issue
is? ·
The Service Manager for Assurance responded that
the resourcing issues highlighted in the report had prevented proactive
understanding the issues within Directorates. However, he assured that whilst
the timescales were not met always within 20 working days, the vast majority of
requests were met within a further 20 days so were not considerably overdue. He
accepted however that there was work to do in understanding the issues. Noted. |
|
Corporate Complaints and Managing Customer Behaviour To receive a report by Marc Eyre, Service Manager for Assurance. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Service Manager
for Assurance introduced the report. He sought endorsement from the Committee
on two policy documents. The first was an update to Our Whole Council Complaint
Process, to reflect a review following a release of the ombudsman complaint code.
A second document was a revision to our managing customer behaviour protocol. Cllr Haynes informed
the Committee that she was on a working group that went through this which
helped to clear things up and made it easier to understand. Proposed by Cllr
Haynes, seconded by Cllr Flower. Decision: that the
Committee reviewed and approved the revised Corporate Complaints Policy; and
reviewed and approved the revised Managing Customer Behaviour Protocol. Reason for
Decision To ensure that the
Corporate Complaints Policy is consistent with the Local Government and Social
Care Ombudsman’s revised Code, and that adverse customer behaviours can be
managed fairly and appropriately. |
|
Update on Our Future Council Work To receive an update by Aidan Dunn, Executive Director Corporate Development. Minutes: The Executive
Director Corporate Development updated the Committee on Our Future Council
Work. He recapped that Our Future Council is the Council’s transformation
programme that seeks to improve the experiences of our customers while reducing
the costs of running and operating the Council. The outline business
case went to Cabinet in November and Cabinet agreed that the Council should
develop a more detailed business case. The finishing touches were being added
to the finalised business case that would go to Cabinet on the 28th of
January. The Joint Overview Committee last week recognised and endorsed the
role of the Audit Committee in looking at the implementation of Our Future
Council Transformation Programme.
|
|
Report of Internal Audit Activity - Progress Report 2024/25 - January 2025 To receive a report by Angie Hooper, SWAP. Additional documents: Minutes: The Principal Auditor, SWAP introduced the report. The third
update report for 2024-25 financial year. SWAP offered a reasonable interim
opinion and issued three limited assurance opinions since the last report:
Temporary Accommodation; Children Services Social Care Complaints; and
Effectiveness of Business Continuity Plans and summary reports are included at
the end of the report. Business Continuity Plans had been identified as having
a significant potential corporate impact and the Information Governance paper
presented earlier in the meeting provided the committee with more details and
plans in place to address the issues identified in the audit. The actions were
due to be implemented by the end of May 2025 and SWAP would report progress of
implementation in our update in July 2025. In the September update it was
agreed to follow up the actions for the limited assurance opinion for Estates
and Income Debt Management because since issuing the report, SWAP had been
advised there was more evidence available that had not been provided at the
time of the audit. The follow up concluded that the original opinion still
stands but 4/5 actions that were due had been completed with 1 in progress. For
implementation of actions as of today- there were 25 overdue actions, 11 of
which had passed their original date and 14 of which passed at least 1 revised
date. There were 10 actions in which the date had been revised once but the
latest revised date had not yet passed. It was disappointing to see the number
of actions with revised timescales remained high, but SWAP was in contact with
officers to obtain updates. The Corporate Director for Finance and
Commercial clarified the process around the Local Housing Allowance and the
setting of rents for temporary accommodation properties. Noted. |
|
To consider the work programme for the Committee. Minutes: No comments were made. |
|
Urgent items To consider any items of business which the Chairman has had prior notification and considers to be urgent pursuant to section 100B (4) b) of the Local Government Act 1972. The reason for the urgency shall be recorded in the minutes. Minutes: There were no urgent items. |
|
Exempt Business To move the exclusion of the press and the public for the following item in view of the likely disclosure of exempt information within the meaning of paragraph 3 of schedule 12 A to the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended). The public and the press will be asked to leave the meeting whilst the item of business is considered. Appendix B – Estates Income and Debt Management Follow Up.
Minutes: Proposed
by Cllr Suttle, seconded by Cllr Flower. Decision That
the press and the public be excluded for the following item(s) in view of the
likely disclosure of exempt information within the meaning of paragraph 3 of
schedule 12 A to the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended). |