To consider a report by the Chief Executive.
Minutes:
The Committee
considered a report by the Chief Executive, which explained the results of the
consultation regarding Dorset Council's proposals for allocating funding to the
voluntary and community sector.
The recently appointed
Portfolio Holder for Customer and Community Services explained that the report
had been developed over a long period and was looking to change from grant
provision to commissioning activity. If
the recommendations were agreed, this would give the organisations currently
working with the Council the confidence to continue with this. They had provided a good response through the
Covid-19 pandemic and it was important to go forward without grant reductions
as they were saving the Council money.
The final recommendation suggested that smaller organisations could bid
for outcome-based funding.
The Business
Partner - Communities and Partnerships explained that when Dorset Council had
been established it had inherited many different funding arrangements. The Cabinet had agreed to a full public
consultation on the future provision of grants to Dorset's voluntary community
sector and this had run for 8 weeks. Overall, the response to the consultation
was positive but since the consultation closed the Covid-19 pandemic had had a
major effect on all areas of the voluntary and community sector. This had led to some financial instability
within the sector and micro groups moving to support local communities. The policy would enable communities to build
and develop new relationships and support prevention at scale. The Committee were asked to support the
recommendations and recommend them to Cabinet for decision.
Members asked a
series of questions about: the EU procurement exercise; whether small groups
currently receiving funding would have an extension of this to 30 September
2021; clarification of Recommendation 3; what outcomes were being sought under
recommendation 5 and were they achievable;
whether there would be support and advice available for micro groups set
up as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic; whether arts and museums had been
included; whether there would be any funding left for the bigger organisations
once the smaller organisations had received their funding; whether Dorset
Community Action, Dorchester Volunteer Centre and the Race Equality Council
could abuse their power; and whether the discretionary outcome-based funding
was allocated by Dorset Council;
In response it was
explained that:
· six months would be
long enough to give notice of changes to current arrangements and undertake a
procurement process under EU regulations;
· funding for small groups would be extended to
30 September 2021;
· currently Dorset Community Action, Dorchester
Volunteer Centre and the Race Equality Council provided the social voluntary
sector infrastructure which would be continued for a further six months;
· those affected by
recommendation 5 had been given notice of the change. If the recommendations were agreed, then
these organisations would receive information about next steps;
· the criteria for the
outcome-based fund had been consulted upon and details were included in the
consultation report. Final details of
the criteria would be signed off by the Portfolio Holder for Customer and
Community Services but all teams administering specialist grants had been
involved to ensure criteria were appropriate for the level of funding;
· Dorset Council officers
would be able to provide expertise and Dorset Community Action could provide
information and guidance to organisations to help them write bids or carry out
an organisational health check so that they were in the best place to access
funding. The Arts Development Company
could provide support for arts and cultural organisations;
· arts and culture had
been added to the Dorset Plan and an extension was being asked for the first
three recommendations to 30 September 2021 to allow the EU procurement process
to be undertaken.
· It was not in the public interest to delay
Recommendations 4 and 5 because there was an inequality in the ways these
organisations were funded by the previous Sovereign Councils. If the recommendations were agreed by
Cabinet, this would enable micro organisations to bid for funding from 1 April
2021. The other recommendations had
extended current arrangements to 30 September 2021 so that there were no gaps
whilst the procurement exercise was undertaken;
· the assets review
currently being undertaken would be reported to Cabinet on 22 November 2020.;
· all organisations would
bid for funding at the same time. This
process was in development and there were potentially three different levels of
funding - under £1,000, £1,00 to £10,000 and over £10,000 and there would be a
different process for each. Details
would be put in place once Cabinet approval had been given;
· the three organisations
would be providing infrastructure and support to the rest of the sector and
would not deliver services. They would
be expected to work in partnership with other organisations and this would be
included in the terms of the new contract.
There was no guarantee that they would be successful if they bid for the
new contract;
· the allocations system
for the discretionary outcome-based funding was being developed and was
expected to be carried out by Dorset Councillors, officers and a representative
from the sector.
The concern was
expressed that Dorset Community Action, Dorchester Volunteer Centre and the
Race Equality Council should not have full control under Recommendations 2 and
3.
The Chairman
referred to the Committee's responsibility for policy making and suggested that
voluntary sector engagement be included into all Dorset Council policies.
The Portfolio
Holder for Adult Social Care and Health reminded members that the Council
should be working in partnership with communities to grow and shape policies
and be looking for opportunities to build community resilience. The Executive Director of People - Children
supported this approach.
It was also
suggested that social prescribing should be embedded into commissioning
criteria.
The Portfolio
Holder for Customer and Community Services added that Council policies seemed
to be in silos currently. As the
integrated care system moved forward, and the Council worked with health
colleagues, towns and parish councils, it would become increasingly difficult
to write everything into every paper. It
was important for a holistic way of working with people to be adopted in order
to try to help residents. It was about social
prescribing but also about getting partners to be part of it. She and the Portfolio Holder for Adult Social
Care and Health had taken this on board.
The Chairman
referred to work undertaken on this by the Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group,
and Locality Health Groups and suggested that a policy be developed on how the
Council should work with health partners.
The Executive Director of People - Children added that senior leadership
team meetings across organisations were being held to look at directing funding
to help people at an early stage. In
Weymouth and Portland engagement with the community was underway to find out
what the communities needed. Although
his process had started, there was more to do.
In terms of the relationship with health partners, Interim Executive
Director of People - Adults explained that they were working across the
integrated care system to build communities and ensure the right care and
support was available in the right place.
The Portfolio Holder for Adult Social Care added that the difficulty of
getting organisations to forego sovereignty had started to change since the
start of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Organisations were now more willing to share and attribute credit to the
integrated care system as a whole and not to individual agencies. She fully supported this change.
The Business
Partner - Communities and Partnerships summarised that there was a need to
ensure that a whole systems approach was taken when looking at future policy
development with the inclusion of partners and the social voluntary
sector.
The Chairman
thanked officers for the work undertaken.
It was proposed by
Cllr P Batstone and seconded by Cllr D Turner and unanimously agreed :-
Recommendations
That the Cabinet
agree to:-
1. The continued provision
of the ‘information, advice and guidance’ service for residents at the current
financial rate for a 5-year term to offer stability. Extension of the current
grant for a further 6 months 1st April – 30th September
2021 to enable a procurement exercise to be undertaken. The new contract to
begin on 1st October 2021
2. The continued
provision of an arts and culture support service at the current financial rate
for a 5-year term. Extension of the current grant for a further 6 months 1st
April – 30th September 2021 to enable a procurement exercise to be
undertaken. The new contract to begin on 1st October 2021
3. The continued
provision of support services to the social voluntary community sector at the
current financial rate for a 5-year term. This will be tendered as one contract
for bidding organisations to work in partnership to deliver the support for the
rest of the social voluntary community sector. Extension of the current grant
recipients for a further 6 months 1st April – 30th
September 2021 to enable a procurement exercise to be undertaken. The new
contract to begin on 1st October 2021
4. The continued
commissioned support of the museums and community centres in which Dorset
Council have a reversionary interest at the current financial rate for a period
of 1 year from 1st April 2021 to be considered within the wider
council buildings and assets review.
5. A discretionary
outcome-based fund to be introduced to replace all historical grant programmes
offered by Dorset Council. Criteria to be modified in accordance to the
comments made in the consultation and agreed with the Cabinet Portfolio Holder.
6. That voluntary
sector engagement be included into all Dorset Council policies.
Reasons for
Recommendations
1. The consultation
has evidenced the value and very strong level of support for the information,
advice and guidance service for residents. Due to the value of the contract,
there is a requirement to procure the service.
The timescales involved in undertaking an open and transparent
procurement exercise will necessitate the need to extend the existing contract
to allow sufficient time for this to be completed.
2. The consultation
has evidenced the value and very strong level of support for the arts support
service. Due to the value of the contract, there is a requirement to procure
the service. The timescales involved in
undertaking an open and transparent procurement exercise will necessitate the
need to extend the existing contract to allow sufficient
time for this to be completed.
3. The consultation
has evidenced the value and very strong level of support for the social VCS
support service. Due to the value of the contract, there is a requirement to
procure the service. The timescales
involved in undertaking an open and transparent procurement exercise will
necessitate the need to extend the existing contract to allow sufficient time for this to be completed. It is acknowledged that the current
organisations worked incredibly effectively together before and during the
COVID-19 pandemic, achieving joint outcomes.
4. The consultation
has evidenced a strong level of support for the museums and community centres
in which the council has a reversionary interest. However, given that the
council is currently undertaking a full review of its assets and buildings, it
would be prudent to agree an initial 1-year extension to allow for these to
form part of the wider review.
5. The consultation
has evidenced a strong level of support for flexible funding to enable
community organisations to identify and resolve local community needs. The
discretionary outcome-based grants will continue to provide vital support to
organisations that provide outcome-based evidence for delivery of Council Plan
priorities. These will be made available by 31st December to give
current grant recipients the opportunity to secure funding before the financial
year end.
Supporting documents: