Meeting documents

West Dorset District Council Executive Committee (Disbanded 11 May 2017)
Monday, 16th January, 2017 2.15 pm

Venue: Rooms A & B, South Walks House, South Walks Road, Dorchester

Contact: Susan Carne 01305 252216  Email: scarne@dorset.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

66.

Code of Conduct

Members are required to comply with the requirements of the Localism Act 2011 and the Council’s Code of Conduct regarding disclosable pecuniary and other interests.

 

Check if there is an item of business on this agenda in which the member or other relevant person has a disclosable pecuniary or other disclosable interest

 

Check that the interest has been notified to the Monitoring Officer (in writing) and entered in the Register (if not this must be done within 28 days)

 

Disclose the interest at the meeting (in accordance with the Council’s Code of Conduct) and in the absence of dispensation to speak and/or vote, withdraw from any consideration of the item where appropriate.  If the interest is non-pecuniary you may be able to stay in the room, take part and vote.

 

For further advice please contact Stuart Caundle, Monitoring Officer, in advance of the meeting.

 

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest.

67.

Exploring Options for the Future of Local Government in Poole, Bournemouth and Dorset pdf icon PDF 86 KB

That Members consider the draft report to Council and provide their comments.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chief Executive introduced the report that invited members to agree and make a submission to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government requesting the restructuring of local government in Dorset.

 

The recommendation from the Executive Committee would be considered by Full Council on 26 January 2017, the recommendations were standard across the 9 councils across Dorset.  The review process had commenced in September 2015 and a great deal of discussion on the options had taken place, including numerous briefing events for all councillors on local government reorganisation and the budget situation, which were inextricably linked.  Due to the need to make savings some tough choices had to be made in order to protect the future delivery of services.  In addition to the appendices to the report, members had also received reports from Local Partnerships, Opinion Research Services and PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers). Out of the options available for reducing the current nine councils to two, option 2b was shown as the preferred option for local government reorganisation.

 

In response to a query on efficiency that had been raised by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, the Leader advised the committee that this issued had been covered in the report by Local Partnerships, which showed the benefits achieved from reduced duplication.  The PwC report also showed that there was further scope for efficiencies through the transformation agenda.  With regard to delegations to town and parish councils it was noted that the district council would continue to work with, and have dialogue with town and parishes on this issue over the next 2 years. It was recognised that it would be very important to maintain connections to local people. The Leader also confirmed that the aim was to set up the two new unitary councils in April 2019.  The DCLG had indicated that the implementation executives would be set up in April 2018, later than anticipated, therefore joint committees maybe required to progress the work required.

 

Members supported the proposals and highlighted that the councils were  ambitious and would like to achieve greater savings than those identified in the Local Partnerships report, through the transformation agenda and rationalisation of property.  In response to a question on council tax convergence the Section 151 Officer reported that the Local Partnerships report had produced a model for council tax convergence over a 20 year period, however this was just a model and the number of years to reach convergence would be a political decision for the new authority. In terms of job losses there was likely to be the loss of 450 managerial posts lost from across the current council structures in Dorset with a stretched target of up to 1,500 job losses.

 

Arising from the consultation results, Cllr Russell highlighted that residents wanted quality and economy of services and that councils needed to consider the needs of residents first rather than focus on structures. In response the Leader agreed that the PwC report set out that customers and residents must take priority above other  ...  view the full minutes text for item 67.