137 Outcome from consultation on provision in Shaftesbury PDF 219 KB
To consider a report of the Portfolio Holder for Children, Education, Skills and Early Help.
Additional documents:
Decision:
Decision
1. That, following public consultation on the future
use of the former St Mary’s School site, the consultation report be noted and
that the Council’s preferred option for the use of the site proceed;
2. That the Business Plan to use the site as an
independent special school for children and young people of Dorset and the
longer-term vision, be approved;
3. That the formation of a company limited by shares
and the entry into such ancillary legal documentation, as may be necessary in
line with the proposed scope contained in the Business Plan, be approved;
4.
That the granting
of indemnities for personal liability incurred by council officers acting in the role of directors of the company, be
approved;
5. That Cabinet agrees to the granting of a lease of
the site to the company on terms to be approved by the Executive Director for
Place in consultation with the Executive Director for People – Children’s; and that
service agreements between the Council and the company to deliver the Business
Plan on terms to be approved by the Executive Director for People - Children's.
6. That authority be delegated the Portfolio Holder
for Children, Education, Skills and Early Help in consultation with the
Executive Director for People – Children’s to deliver the Dorset Council
actions within the Business Plan.
Reason for the decision 1:
The consultation on the future use of the former St
Mary’s School site received 1,427 responses from a wide variety of individuals
and organisations. Nearly 90% of responses came from Dorset Council residents,
including 32% of responses which came from local residents (within 3 miles of
the site).
There
was overwhelming support for the St Marys site to continue to be used for
educational purposes, with 92% overall in favour. In addition, there was very
strong support for specifically using St Marys as a school for children and
young people with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) with 89%
overall in favour alongside 82% of respondents that signalled strong support
for the additional use of the St Mary’s site to create complementary facilities
for vulnerable children, young people and adults.
This
demonstrated strong support to deliver the Council’s preferred option to create
a new independent school for children and young people of Dorset with SEND.
Reason
for the decision 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
In order to deliver the Council’s preferred option,
a detailed 5-year Business Plan has been completed setting out the next steps
the Council will need to take to establish a Company to operate the new
independent special school alongside the longer-term vision for the site and
arrangements for the land to be used by the Company. The Business Plan sets out
that a Company that will be set up for the purposes of operating the site and
school, and this will be through the formation of Company Limited by Shares
(which may be established as a standard or Community Interest Company).
Approval of this decision allows the named Members ... view the full decision text for item 137
Minutes:
The
Portfolio Holder for Children’s , Education, Skills and Early Help presented a
report on the purchase of St Mary’s School site in Shaftesbury and on the
outcome of the public consultation in respect of the council’s preferred option
for the site. Prior to presenting the detail of the report a short
communications video about the site was shared with the meeting.
In
presenting the report the Portfolio Holder advised that acquiring the former St
Mary’s school site was an unique opportunity to deliver an independent school
for children with special educational needs (SEND). The site had extensive
facilities which would enable the council to build capacity at a rapid rate,
but also at a fraction of the capital cost of a new build proposal.
The
Portfolio Holder further advised that
the council was setting out to make the site a “centre of excellence” in the
field of SEND provision and it aimed to complement the councils current
provision and work that was being carried out within mainstream schools. He
also took the time to thank officers, and the project board for the work they
had carried out to date.
In
respect of the public consultation process, the Portfolio Holder reported
that a total of 1427 responses had been
received. 92% of those who responded were in favour of the site continuing to
be used for educational purposes. With 89% supporting the proposal to open a
school for SEND provision. He further reported that the proposal had seen support
from neighbouring authorities.
The
Portfolio Holder advised that the business plan set out a phase of growth for
pupil numbers; starting with an initial cohort of 60 pupils, expected to take
up their school place in January 2022.
There was planned growth of places over the next five years with the aim
of achieving 280 pupils by 2026.
In
concluding his presentation the Portfolio Holder set out and proposed the
reports recommendations.
The
Chairman welcomed the report and invited
questions from members not on Cabinet.
In
response to a question regarding trading as a limited company by shares rather
than guarantee and around the arrangements for staffing as an independent
facility, the Portfolio Holder and
Executive Director of People (Children’s) confirmed that to trade as a limited
company by shares was the best model recommended to the council and the running
of an independent educational establishment. In respect of appointing staff, an
interim team would first be put into place with permanent staffing being
recruited as the independent education establishment progressed.
Responding
to questions regarding placements and sustainability, the Executive Director
for People Children’s confirmed that conversations had been held with
neighbouring councils and it was likely that some may wish to purchase
placements. However all councils looked
to try to keep their children as close to home as possible. Members were
further advised that over a third of Dorset children with education health and
care plans lived within a suitable distance of the site.
Cabinet members made the following observations:- ... view the full minutes text for item 137