Venue: A link to the meeting can be found on the front page of the agenda.. View directions
Contact: Denise Hunt 01305 224878 - Email: denise.hunt@dorsetcouncil.gov.uk
No. | Item | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apologies To receive any apologies for absence Minutes: No apologies for absence were received at the meeting. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declarations of Interest To receive any declarations of interest Minutes: Cllr David Gray declared that he had predetermined
Application No WP/19/00516/FUL - Land West of Roman
Road and North of Spa Road, Weymouth as he had been involved with a residents'
group opposing the development and had also spoken at a Weymouth Town Council
meeting against the proposal. He would
not take part in the debate or vote on this application. Cllr Jean Dunseith declared that
she had predetermined Application No WD/D/19/002865 - Land Adjacent Putton
Lane, Chickerell and would not take part in the discussion or vote. However, she would speak as the ward member
during public participation for this item. Cllr Peter Barrow declared that he
had made some comments at a meeting of Weymouth Town Council in July 2019 in
relation to Application No WP/19/00516/FUL -
Land West of Roman Road and North of Spa Road, Weymouth, that expressed the
views of local residents. However, he
had come to this Area Planning Committee meeting with an open mind and would
not come to a conclusion about the application until such time as he had heard
all of the information presented at the meeting. Cllr Kelvin Clayton declared that
Application No WD/D/19/002027- The Mound, Quayside, West Bay had been
considered at a meeting of the Bridport Town Council Planning Committee,
however, he had given his apology at the meeting when this was discussed. Cllr Louie O'Leary declared that
he knew the agent, Mr Richard Burgess on a personal level and would not take
part in the debate or vote in Application No WP/19/00516/FUL
- Land West of Roman Road and North of Spa Road, Weymouth or WD/D/19/001056 -
Trafalgar Farm, 34 Portesham, Weymouth. Cllr Sarah Williams declared that
she had declared an interest and not taken part in the debate when Application
No WD/D/19/002027 - The Mound, Quayside, West Bay had been discussed at a
meeting of the Bridport Town Council Planning Committee. She further stated
that this application had not been considered by the Dorset Council Harbours
Committee. Cllr Kate Wheller declared an
interest in Application No WP/19/00516/FUL -
Land West of Roman Road and North of Spa Road, Weymouth as she had taken part
in consideration of this application as a member of Weymouth & Portland
Borough Council's Planning Committee.
She would not take part in the debate or vote on this application. Cllr Kate Wheller also declared an interest in Application No WD/D/19/002027 - The Mound, Quayside, West Bay as Chairman of the Dorset Council Harbours Committee. She would not take part in the debate or vote on this application. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 7 May 2020. Additional documents: Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 7 May 2020 were approved. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public Participation PDF 48 KB Members of the public wishing to submit a written
representation to the Committee on a planning application should notify the
Democratic Services Officer listed on the front of this agenda. This
must be done no later than two clear working days before the meeting. Please note that the deadline for written submissions
to the Area Planning Committee is at 8.30am on Tuesday 26 May
2020. Please refer to the Guidance to Public Speaking at a Planning Committee and specifically the "Covid-19 Pandemic – Addendum to the Guide to Public Speaking Protocol for Planning
Committee meetings" included with this agenda. Additional documents: Minutes: Representations by the public to the Committee on individual planning applications are detailed below and are also attached to these minutes. There were no questions, petitions or deputations received on other items on this occasion. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Planning Applications PDF 312 KB To consider the applications listed below for planning permission. Minutes: Members
considered written reports submitted on planning applications as set out below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WP/19/00516/FUL - Land West of Roman Road and North of Spa Road, Weymouth PDF 182 KB Erection of 13 no. houses and 6 no. flats with associated access and parking. Minutes: Cllr David Gray, Cllr Louie
O'Leary and Cllr Kate Wheller did not take part in the debate or vote on this
item. The Committee considered an
application for the erection of 13 houses and 6 flats with associated access
and parking. Members were shown a location plan and aerial photograph
showing the informal footpath to the Manor roundabout and Spa Road, listed
buildings located 100metres from the site and trees alongside Weymouth Way. An
extract from the Local Plan Map showed that the site was adjacent to, but
outside of, the Defined Development Boundary (DDB) and the layout plan provided
an overview of the basic structure of the site and the Conservation Area
boundary extending over a large area including Radipole Village. It had been made clear in the report that, in
the absence of a 5 year housing land supply such sites
should be considered for development potential if sustainable. The layout plans included appropriate new planting and the
Senior Planning Officer drew attention to a cypress tree that was subject to a
Tree Preservation Order. He confirmed
that whilst this tree overhung the application site, it did not form part of
it. A plan of the southern part of the site showed the scope of additional
landscaping and new planting to include field maple and damson in addition to
hedgerows. He confirmed that some of the
existing copse would need to be removed as a result of this development. Slides were shown of the various elevations and floor plans
of the proposed dwellings in addition to photos of the site and surrounding
area showing Weymouth Way in relation to the site, existing vegetation and
copse, the informal footpath and character of nearby houses, including the
Radipole historic buildings. The Key Planning matters were highlighted including that the
scheme:- ·
was adjacent to the DDB in a sustainable
location; ·
considered to be appropriate development in the
Conservation Area given the
current context; ·
included the retention of a footpath link that
was improved; ·
addressed ecological matters; ·
included the provision of 32% affordable housing
on-site with the shortfall as a
financial contribution of £29,000; and ·
provided an additional19 houses to the local
housing land supply. The scheme would
include 6 affordable housing dwellings on site, with the financial contribution
being used to provide affordable housing elsewhere which was supported by the Housing Enabling Officer and
was in accordance with policy. A number of written submissions in objection of the proposal and a statement
by the agent were read out at the meeting and are attached to these minutes. The Senior Planning
Officer responded on the following points in response to the issues raised in
the written submissions:- ·
That the
application site outside the DDB had been explored extensively in the report
under the principle of development. · The Council's 5 year housing land supply equated to 4.83 years which undermined the housing policies in the adopted Local Plan. It was therefore necessary to look carefully at sites that came forward even ... view the full minutes text for item 110. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Duration of Meeting - Time Limit Minutes: A vote to continue the
meeting was taken in accordance with Part 2, Paragraph 8.1 of the
Council's Constitution as the meeting had been ongoing for a period of 3 hours. Decision:
That the meeting be extended to allow the business of the meeting to be concluded. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WD/D/19/002865 - Land Adjacent Putton Lane, Chickerell PDF 424 KB Erection of 7no. dwellings. Minutes: Councillor Jean Dunseith did not take part in the debate or vote on this item. She spoke as the Dorset Council - Chickerell ward member during public participation. The Committee considered an application for the erection of 7 dwellings on land adjacent to Putton Lane, Chickerell. The application site was inside the DDB within the wider Local Plan allocation and represented an undeveloped parcel of land that had remained vacant whilst development was constructed around it. An additional representation raising health and safety issues in relation to the busy junction had been received that was included in an update sheet circulated to members in advance of the meeting. Members were shown a site plan and aerial photo showing a terrace of 3 properties and a second line of development behind it with two sets of semi- detached units (4 homes in total); elevations and floor plans and photos of the site, including the proposed access and neighbouring properties. The Senior Planning Officer outlined that the site had previously been earmarked for a GP surgery, that was subsequently considered to be inappropriate due to its size and lack of available transport options. Cllr John Worth, Dorset Council - Chickerell Ward, addressed the committee and said that alternative sites had been identified for a medical centre that were subject to further discussions. He referred to the designation of Chickerell as a rural area in the 1997 Housing Order and paragraph 63 of the NPPF which indicated that affordable housing should not be sought for non-major housing development unless in a rural area. He felt that a deed of variation should have been applied for prior to consideration of this application due to the non-provision of a GP surgery and the lack of affordable housing. The Senior Planning Officer confirmed that the affordable housing threshold for rural areas was 5 units if the site was in the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and 10 units for this site as it was not in the AONB. The requirement for the Section 106 Agreement to be varied was a separate matter to this application. Cllr Jean Dunseith, Dorset Council - Chickerell Ward, addressed the committee and stated that she regretted that the Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group had rejected this site for a medical centre as it was relatively central and spacious, although she accepted that it was not ideal. She was concerned about road safety in the vicinity and that turning the access 90 degrees would provide better sight line for drivers. A written statement was read out on behalf of the applicant which is attached to these minutes. The Highways Officer confirmed that the proposal complied with guidance and that the layout of the scheme enabled informal areas of parking within the site. Tactile paving and parking white lines in relation to the crossing point on the north eastern corner of the site remained under discussion with the developer and would continue to be monitored. Members were concerned about the availability of ... view the full minutes text for item 112. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WD/D/19/001056 - Trafalgar Farm, 34 Portesham, Weymouth, DT3 4ET PDF 350 KB Erect single storey dwelling. Minutes: The Committee considered an application to erect a single
storey dwelling. The site was adjacent to the DDB and within the Portesham Conservation Area. The Chairman reminded the committee that ownership of
property was not relevant to the planning decision. Members were shown a location plan showing Portesham and Front Street, with land owned by the
applicant outlined in blue; an aerial photo showing the application site in
red; a site plan and elevations and floor plan. Photos were shown of the site entrance of compacted crushed
stoned, adjacent grade II listed building; properties on the other side of
Front Street; various views of the site including an existing caravan and semi
delipidated farm buildings. No changes were proposed to the access and there had been no
objection to the application by the Highways Team. An existing mobile home on the site had a
certificate of lawful use and was permitted development. It was likely that the applicant would use
this until the new building was constructed. The policies and issues were highlighted, including that the
proposal was adjacent to the DDB, would add to the housing supply, would not
cause significant harm to the Conservation Area, was of a single storey design
and the existing caravan / mobile home had established use. The Senior Planning Officer advised that she had received
confirmation of the applicant's ownership of the land and that the application
had been made correctly. However,
ownership was not a planning matter or material consideration in the
consideration of this application. This
was reiterated by the Solicitor who confirmed that she had seen the land
registry entry showing the appropriate ownership and that the Council was not
required to look behind that entry. Written submissions by Cllr Ray Doggett - Chesil Bank Parish
Council and the agent were read out at the meeting and are attached to these
minutes. A written submission by Paul Dunlop - Blanchards
Bailey Solicitor was not read out in its entirety due to the personal nature of
its contents. The Chairman asked whether the site was within the curtilage
of the listed building. The Senior Planning Officer stated that there was a clear
definition between the garden of the listed building and the application site
that did not give the impression of being within the curtilage of the listed
building. The Solicitor commented that the setting of the listed
building was relevant and that the committee had to determine the application
before it rather than alternatives that may be forthcoming. Proposed by Cllr David Gray, seconded by Cllr Kelvin
Clayton. Decision: That the application be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the appendix to these minutes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WD/D/19/002093 - Old School House, Looke Lane, Puncknowle, Dorchester, DT2 9BD PDF 215 KB Erect a double storey extension and alterations. Minutes: The Committee considered an application to erect a double
storey extension and alterations. Members were shown a site location plan; aerial view of the former
school which was now a village hall; proposed site plan; photos of the site
from various viewpoints; proposed elevations and floor plans and materials
slide. The Key planning points were highlighted including; ·
Principle of development - extension to
dwellings in villages with no DDB was normally considered acceptable in
principle; ·
Amenity - not considered to result in a
significant adverse effect on living conditions of neighbouring properties or
future occupiers of the proposed development; ·
Design & impact on setting of heritage
assets considered acceptable given the Conservation Area designation and what
was outlined in the Conservation Area Appraisal for this village; ·
Detrimental impact, eroding character of Old
School House and Old School; ·
Mentioned 4 times within the Conservation Area
Appraisal and is a locally important building, a key view within the village
and a landmark; and ·
No overriding public benefit to outweigh the
less substantial harm as set out in NPPF. The reasons for refusal due to the scale and bulk of the
extension and its impact on the conservation area were outlined. Written representations were received from Cllr Philip Fry -
Chairman of Puncknowle and Swyre
Parish Council and the Agent which were read out at the meeting and are
attached to these minutes. In response to a question regarding UPVC windows, members
were informed that the existing building was not listed and already had UPVC
windows, and that the applicant was reciprocating that approach. The Chairman drew attention to maintaining affordability of
homes in local villages outlined in the Local Plan and that this extension
would make this property less affordable in future. Officers referred to Local
Plan paragraph 5.2 and acknowledged that this development would represent a
significant increase in value. Members were shown a plan identifying the wider Conservation
Area boundary and listed buildings in the area.
It was confirmed that the properties in the vicinity of the application
site were characterful but were not listed. Some members expressed support for the application and
considered that it would not unduly impact on the Conservation Area. They noted that the extension would not be seen
from Church Street and that extending the building would help a young couple to
stay in the village and turn the property into a modern family home. Some conditions were suggested should the application be
approved that included the standard 3 year commencement period, a plans list
condition and external materials to comprise of stone and rendered walls with a
slate roof and UPVC fenestration. Proposed by Cllr Kate Wheller, seconded by Cllr Nick
Ireland. Decision: That the application be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the appendix to these minutes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WD/D/19/001397 - Sunnyside Cottage, Highgate Lane, West Knighton, Dorchester, DT2 8PE PDF 184 KB Erection of double garage with annexe accommodation. Minutes: The Committee considered an application to erect a double
garage with annexe accommodation. Members were shown a site location plan; aerial view; site
plan; an extract showing the DDB and Conservation Area boundaries,
listed buildings and modern residential buildings; proposed elevations, floor
plans and site plan, a bird's eye view of the proposal and google images of the
application site. The key planning matters were highlighted and the Area
Manager - Western stated that this was a well-designed scheme and that the
principle issue was not one of affordability, but whether the structure sat
well in the Conservation Area, whether it was harmful to the amenity of
neighbours or in its impact on the listed buildings. Written submissions had been received from Nicky Busst (Planning Officer) and Cllr Martin Mitchard (both of Knightsford Parish Council), the applicant and the agent
which were read out at the meeting and are attached to these minutes. Cllr Roland Tarr - Dorset Council - Winterborne
and Broadmayne ward, stated that he represented the
interests of the Parish Council and had requested that this application was
considered by the committee. Members asked about the height of the building in relation
to the neighbouring property. Members
were informed that the previous scheme had been higher and that officers
considered the scale was now acceptable and not sufficiently dominant to
warrant refusal. Proposed by Cllr N Ireland, seconded by Cllr Sarah Williams. Decision: That the application be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the appendix to these minutes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WD/D/19/002027 - The Mound, Quayside, West Bay PDF 218 KB Removal of shipping container and erection of a building used to house and refill diving tanks. Minutes: Cllr Kate Wheller did not take part in the vote on this
application. The Committee considered an application for the removal of a
shipping container and erection of a building used to house and refill diving
tanks. Members were shown a location plan, site plan, elevation and
floor plans, photos of the application site and surrounding harbour area. The policies and issues were highlighted, including impact
on the Conservation Area and on the setting of the listed harbour wall and
buildings. Due to the small scale of the proposal it was not necessary
to include an Environmental Health condition in relation to the timing of
demolition work. Cllr Kate Wheller addressed the Committee as Chairman of the
Harbours Committee which had asked the Harbour Master to improve harbour
income. This application followed a
successful trial period of supplying air to the diving community from an
existing portacabin. Proposed by Cllr Nick Ireland, seconded by Cllr David Gray. Decision: That the application be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the appendix to these minutes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WD/D/19/002947 - Land Adjacent to Railway Station, Off Station Road, Maiden Newton, Dorchester Minutes: Members were shown a
location plan, aerial view, a plan showing an area of mitigation for the
reptiles, photos of the footbridge over the railway and location of the path. The key planning
matters were highlighted including:- ·
that the layout and design was considered
acceptable; ·
no significant harm to neighbouring residential
amenity; ·
some loss of self-set trees on site and impact
on wildlife habitat in respect of reptiles;
·
a certified approved Biodiversity Mitigation and
Enhancement Plan accompanied the application and its implementation could be
conditioned; and ·
there were no material considerations which
would warrant refusal of the application. A late
representation had been received that was circulated in an update sheet to
members the day before the meeting. Cllr Anthony Alford,
Dorset Council - Eggardon Ward, addressed the
Committee in support of the proposal which he described as a small part of a
valuable contribution to the health and wellbeing offer in the area. Written submissions
in objection of the scheme had been received from from
3 members of the public which were read out at the meeting and are attached to
these minutes The Chairman
confirmed that this proposal would provide a link from Station Road onto the
area South West of the existing railway tracks, providing level access into the
bay. Proposed by Cllr
Kelvin Clayton, seconded by Cllr Peter Barrow. Decision: That the application be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the appendix to these minutes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Urgent items To consider any items of business which the Chairman has had prior notification and considers to be urgent pursuant to section 100B (4) b) of the Local Government Act 1972 The reason for the urgency shall be recorded in the minutes. Minutes: There were no urgent items. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Update Sheet Minutes:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||