Venue: Meeting Room 1, County Hall, Dorchester, DT1 1XJ. View directions
Contact: Helen Whitby 01305 224187 - Email: helen.whitby@dorsetcouncil.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies To receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Mathew Kendall, Patricia Miller, Sarah Parker, John Sellgren and Eugene Yafele. Claire Shiels and Rebecca Kirk attended as reserve members. |
|
Declarations of Interest To receive any declarations of interest. Minutes: No declarations of disclosable pecuniary interests were made at the meeting. |
|
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 26 June 2019. Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 26 June 2019 were confirmed and signed. |
|
Public Participation To receive questions or statements on the business of the
committee from town and parish councils and members of the public. Minutes: There were no statements and questions considered at the meeting. |
|
Urgent items - Our Dorset Looking Forward PDF 129 KB To consider any items of business which the Chairman has had
prior notification and considers to be urgent pursuant to section 100B (4) b) of
the Local Government Act 1972. The reason for the urgency shall be recorded in
the minutes. Additional documents:
Minutes: The following item
of business was considered by the Chairman as urgent pursuant to section 100B (4)
b) of the Local Government Act 1972. The Board had considered an early draft of
the plan but the change of meeting date meant that an updated version could be
considered before it was submitted to NHS England (NHSE) on 1 November 2019. The Board considered
a report by the Chief Operating Officer, Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group,
on Our Dorset Looking Forward, the latest draft of Dorset's local five-year
strategy responding to the national NHS Long Term Plan. The Chief Operating
Officer explained changes made since the Board last considered the plan and
highlighted areas where action was still needed. The next version would be submitted to NHSE
on 1 November 2019 and the final draft submitted on 15 November 2019. At a recent meeting, the NHSE had highlighted
that the plan underplayed activity within Dorset. This information would be added to the
Executive Summary. It was requested
that the Chairman have sight of any significant changes to the plan prior to
its final submission. This was agreed. Particular attention
was drawn to the Transformation Map 2020/21 to 2023/24 set out on the final
page of the report, for the Board's need to monitor the plan and for any issues
to be reported to it. The financial and
delivery challenges were recognised and that it would take a collective effort
by all to succeed in translating the plan to delivery on the ground. This would require the Primary Care networks
and community care to work more closely together to improve the wider
determinants of health for young and old. The plan should work
seamlessly with plans from other organisations and with the Chairman of Dorset
Community Action now being a Board member there were opportunities for their
greater involvement. Resolved 1. That the direction of travel within the plan
be approved 2. That delegated authority be given to the
Integrated Care System Leader (Tim Goodson), after consultation with the
Chairman, to approve the final version of the plan for submission to NHSE on 15
November 2019. |
|
2019 /20 Better Care Fund Plan Approval PDF 109 KB To consider a report by the Head of Commissioning – Adult Social Care, Dorset Council. Additional documents: Minutes: The Board considered a report
by the Head of Commissioning - Adult Social Care, Dorset Council, which sought
the Board's approval of the Better Care Fund (BCF) Plan 2019/20. The Board had given delegated authority in
June 2019 to the Executive Director for People - Adults after consultation with
the Chairman to sign off the plan which was submitted to NHS regional teams in
September 2019. The Board also received
a presentation from the Head of Commissioning.
The Portfolio Holder for
Adult Social Care and Health recommended that the plan be approved but
suggested that future reports include practical case studies and their impacts. The presentation provided an
overview and information about the national policy framework for 2019/20,
content of the BCF plan for 2019/20, expected impact for 2019/20, a summary of
BCF income, BCF metrics and the winter pressures scheme. Members noted: work with
partners was being undertaken in order to project future needs, identify hot
spots and the care that would be needed within them; how costs were being
limited; work with the community rehabilitation team to assess people's need
for therapy; how feedback from reablement users was captured and used; the move
to working together more closely in order to meet BCF Targets; steps being
taken to reduce hospital admissions by intervention at home; the availability
of emergency care work so that patients could return home even if care packages
were not in place; and steps being taken to speed up the assessment process. The Chairman welcomed future
reports including more illustrations of how the BCF was making a difference,
recognised the role of organisations assisting communities to help maintain
people's independence and wanted examples of good work to be rolled out to
other areas. Attention was drawn to
current BCF funding of £132m and questions asked as to whether there was
evidence to show its impact, whether progress was fast enough and whether what
worked or not informed future actions.
The Head of Commissioning confirmed that what worked and did not work
was taken into account but work undertaken had had a
medium rather than high impact. Whilst
ambition had not been high there had been a significant number of challenges in
the last couple of years. There were a number of positives, including the positive effect of the
winter pressures schemes on the acute trusts, so much so they were now funding
winter pressures initiatives themselves.
Although officers were now better able to predict trends for need it was
important for information to be accessible and this was not the case
currently. He asked the Board to help
with this. The Chairman reminded members
of their ownership of the BCF which was jointly managed by Dorset Council and
the Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group.
It was partnership work which would ensure that people were safe and
well and she emphasised the need for better links with prevention officers with regard to delivery of the BCF. Resolved 1. That the 2019/20 BCF Plan be approved. 2. That ... view the full minutes text for item 20. |
|
Sustainability Transformation Plan - Update with a Focus on Prevention at Scale PDF 130 KB To consider a report by the Consultant in Public Health. Minutes: The Board considered a
report by the Consultant in Public Health which provided an update on key
highlights from across the STP as a whole and progress
on prevention at scale since the last meeting. The
Director of Public Health presented the report highlighting: opportunities
through Our Dorset Looking Forward to progress work started under the STP and
focus on the wider determinants of health; the need for organisations to share
intelligence; how prevention was being embedded within council services and the
adoption of a whole system approach; that more NHS funding would lead to more
accessible services; that £1m was needed to fund prevention at scale work over
the next three years; that in order to increase impact areas to focus on should
be identified and how these could be resourced; that some investment was at
risk of not being maintained; and the Board's role to ensure that there was no
duplication of services. The
Chief Constable explained that any new funding now came with priorities
attached and that these were aimed at reducing crime and prevention of
harm. He was keen to look at harm and
violence reduction as his force's contribution to prevention at scale. The Fire Authority representative added that
although they could not contribute funding, they could help in other ways and
share information about the vulnerable people they came into
contact with. There
was some discussion about county lines and whether there could be early
intervention work done in schools before children reached crisis stage. The Chief Constable explained that he had a
small team who visited schools and their programme was being refreshed and
updated. Once this was completed, he
would liaise with Dorset Council as to how this could be used to raise
awareness. The Assistant Director for
Commissioning and Partnerships drew attention to the fact that many vulnerable
children did not go to school. Attention
was drawn to the fact that many organisations held information about vulnerable
people, some of whom would be known to multiple organisations. This information was not shared
currently. The Chief Constable agreed to
take the lead in progressing data sharing across organisations. Members were asked to arrange for their
intelligence leads to contact the Chief Constable to progress this. One
member gave an example where a few people had used council buildings during the
evening for an activity and that this had now grown into a network within a
deprived area. He hoped that more could
be done through Primary Care Networks on a locality basis. Population management was about overlaying
data in order to come to a different view as to who was vulnerable and the
approach that was needed. The
voluntary sector representative explained that his focus was on supporting the
Primary Care Networks and he would provide an initiative outline, including
data collection. Resolved 1. That the update on STP highlights and
highlighted progress on prevention at scale be noted. 2. That the ongoing work be supported, within the Board and back ... view the full minutes text for item 21. |
|
Physical Activity Strategy PDF 112 KB To consider a report by Active Dorset. Additional documents: Minutes: The
Board considered a report by Active Dorset on the Physical Activity
Strategy. They also received a
presentation from Martin Kimberly and Charlie Coward, Active Dorset. The
presentation covered the scale of ambition for the strategy, set out key
stakeholders, the health benefits of physical activity, examples of system
changes being made in the secondary care and primary care pathways, changes
being made in localities and in the workforce, why a strategy was needed, gaps
in knowledge, the strategy needed to be in addition to Our Dorset, the two
options to be considered and the need for the Board to identify a member
champion for the Strategy. Members
noted that the Strategy covered Dorset, Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole
Council areas and aimed for a more co-ordinated approach. The Board was asked
to choose between Option 1 (Commissioning and external report. Tender
anticipated at £20-30,000) and Option 2 (a Joint Strategic Needs Assessment
(JSNA) process supported by all Health and Wellbeing Board member
organisations. This would have low or no cost but would rely on officer time
and organisational engagement). The
Board was also asked to appoint a Champion for the Strategy. There
was some discussion about the two options, how behavioural change could be
encouraged, the Board's influence over planning and local authority services,
and how better use of resources might encourage people to be more active. If
Option 2 was adopted, it was suggested that the Local Enterprise Partnership
and the Local Nature Partnership (LNP) should be involved. The LNP had links to the natural choices
agenda which encouraged people to become more active and the benefit of
exercising in the natural environment was highlighted. It was also suggested that social care and
health professionals should signpost people to Livewell
and activities within their areas. One
member drew attention to her experience of using Livewell's
activity finder and the Director and Assistant Director of Public Health were
asked to ensure that it and links to other sites were working. Attention
was drawn to the fact that Dorset Council reports now included reference to the
impact of climate change but more that could be done to embed this within all
areas of the Council. It was also noted that Dorset County Council reports had
included reference to the impact on health and wellbeing being but this had not
crossed over to the new Council. The
Leader of the Council agreed to consider whether more could be done across the
Council's services to encourage people to be more active. Members
agreed that Option 2 should be progressed and noted that the Bournemouth,
Christchurch and Poole Health and Wellbeing Board had also agreed this as the
way forward. The Chairman agreed to act
as the Board's Champion and would receive regular feedback on progress. Resolved 1. That Option 2 be adopted (a Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) process supported by all Health and Wellbeing Board member organisations. This would have low or no cost but would rely on officer time and organisational ... view the full minutes text for item 22. |
|
Pharmacy Application Process PDF 113 KB To consider a report by the Director of Public Health. Minutes: The Board considered a report
by the Director of Public Health on how pharmacy applications were considered
and recommendations to enable the Board to carry out its role as statutory
consultee and respond as required. The Board was notified of any
applications for changes to pharmacies.
Delegations were sought to allow the Director of Public Health to decide
whether a response was needed and, in cases where a response was required or
there might be a significant impact, the Chairman and Portfolio Holder for
Adult Social Care and Health would be consulted. Some changes would continue to be reported to
the Board. Resolved 1. That
delegated authority be given to the Director of Public Health to respond (or
not) to applications for relocation. 2. That
delegated authority be given to the Director of Public Health, in consultation
with the Chairman and Portfolio Holder, to respond to applications where a
response is required or where the potential impact may be significant. |
|
To consider the Board's Work Programme. Minutes: The Board considered its work
programme. The Chairman suggested that
the informal session of the meeting on 27 November 2019 be used to look at how
the Board functioned, actions and joint responsibilities which would lead to
members having responsibility for their work programme. It was also suggested that future informal
sessions provide an opportunity for individual members to raise particular
issues or areas of concern they faced in order to get advice, views or support
from other members on how these could be addressed or resolved. This approach was supported by Board members.
Attention was drawn to the
new Primary Care Networks and the lack of representation from education and schools. The Assistant Director for Commissioning and
Partnership agreed that Primary Care Networks and other governance arrangements
could be better joined up and agreed to look at this. The formal meeting on 27
November 2019 would comprise reports on the Better Care Fund and Education
Health Care Plans. The Voluntary Sector
representative would provide information on his area, how data could be
coordinated and what facilities were available to support the Board's
work. The Board also agreed that future
meetings should start at 1.00pm and other venues be used so that Board members
could see prevention at scale work in localities. Resolved 1. That the informal session on 27 November
2019 be used to look at how the Board functioned, actions and joint responsibilities. 2. That future informal sessions provide an
opportunity for individual members to raise particular issues or areas of
concern they faced. 3. That the formal session on 27 November 2019
would consider reports on the Better Care Fund, Education Health Care Plans and
information on the voluntary sector. 4. The Voluntary Sector representative provide
information on his area, how data could be coordinated and what facilities were
available to support the Board's work. 5. That future meetings start at 1.00pm and be
held at other venues where prevention at scale could be demonstrated. 6. That future meetings start at 1.00pm and,
where possible, be held at venues where members could see prevention at scale
work in localities. |