Demolish existing commercial workshop & erect new electric vehicle (EV) hub including workshop, EV/PV information point, retail area & including cafe/pit stop and a covered parking area with roof mounted solar array to both structures.
Minutes:
Simon Sharp.
Planning Officer, presented to members the application to Demolish existing commercial workshop &
erect new electric vehicle (EV) hub including workshop, EV/PV information
point, retail area & including cafe/pit stop and a covered parking area
with roof mounted solar array to both structures. Members were
shown the location of the site as well as aerial photographs and details
regarding listed buildings in the area. Members were assured that there was no
harm identified to these buildings. The Case Officer provided members with
details of the proposed floorplan of the site as well as details of the outdoor
seating for retail use as well as charging points. Site access and the proposed
elevations for car parking were also discussed. The recommendation was to grant
planning permission subject to conditions in the report.
Steve Savage, Head
of Highways, informed members that the site would include 26 car parking
spaces, including two disabled parking spaces and some fast and slow charging
points. Members were informed that parking met the standards and there would be
few needed for staff. He also discussed the reduction in speed limit;
therefore, the road would be subject to 30mph. Highways also informed members
that the proposal would generate more traffic, but the proposal wouldn’t have a
severe impact and there would be low traffic movement. Highways did not
identify any grounds for refusal and therefore supported the application.
Public
Participation
Members of the
public spoke in objection to the planning committee. Concerns were raised
regarding the site being in an unsuitable location and therefore it would
create an increase in road traffic on an unsuitable and dangerous road. The
public also discussed the impact that the development would have on the AONB.
They also raised their concerns on the impacts of protected species in the
area. The Parish Council discussed the lack of need of the development in the
area, they praised the use of renewable energy but strongly believed it would
be ideal in a different location as the local people didn’t want or need it.
Members of the Public also informed members that the site would increase light
pollution, consideration would need to be made regarding opening hours. They
urged the committee to refuse the recommendation to approve planning
permission.
The
agent spoke for the application. He informed members as to how the applicant
had supported the climate emergency through the introduction of charging
points. He assured members that the proposed building would have been a similar
size to the original and the additional size would have been for the use of
charging points. The agent confirmed that there would be no competition to the
local farm shop.
Members questions
and comments
· Confirmation regarding biodiversity
plan being approved.
· Risk of site flooding.
· Amount of charge people would
receive from slow charging points.
· Pedestrian access to the site and
visibility. Members raised their concerns regarding an increase in pedestrian
movement on the road.
· Concerns regarding environmental impacts
on the area and view from footpaths.
· Number of hours and timings of
access to the charging points.
· Consideration of rapid chargers.
· Lighting restrictions on site.
· Members discussed the importance of
encouraging small businesses, especially those making improvements to the
environment.
· Members praised the good screening
but had concerns regarding glazing and asked the planning officer for details
about anti-glare glazing.
· Opening hours and use of the outside
seating area was discussed. Members considered conditioning for winter opening
hours due to light pollution. Some members didn’t believe that conditions would
be sufficient.
Having had the
opportunity to discuss the merits of the application and an understanding of
all this entailed; having considered the officer’s report and presentation; the
written representatives; and what they had heard at the meeting, in being
proposed by Cllr Pothecry and seconded by Cllr Andrews.
Decision: To overturn the proposal and refuse the
planning application for the following reasons:
1.
The
development is within an unsustainable location where a need has not been
demonstrated for the mixed use proposed. The proposal is therefore contrary to
policies 2 and 20 of the North Dorset Local Plan 2016.
2.
The
extent of glazing proposed, the associated external lighting and the hours of
operation will result in a significant and harmful level of adverse impact to
the dark skies and landscape qualities of the Cranborne Chase and West
Wiltshire Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, contrary to policy 24 of
the North Dorset Local Plan 2016.
Cllr Jones and Cllr
Pothecry proposed that the meeting would carry over 3 hours.
Supporting documents: