The creation of intertidal habitat and restricted tidal exchange shallow saltwater lagoons, through managed realignment involving selective breaching of existing tidal embankments. The provision of new set-back earth embankments, including the provision of flapped surface water outfalls, tidal exchange culverts, and an improved channel and outfall for the Furzebrook Stream. The formation of permissive footpaths and screens for public to view birds from, maintenance access tracks and the provision of associated gates, fences and boundary treatment works.
Minutes:
The Case Officer
presented to members the creation of intertidal habitat and restricted tidal
exchange shallow saltwater lagoons, through managed realignment involving selective
breaching of existing tidal embankments. The provision of new set-back earth
embankments, including the provision of flapped surface water outfalls, tidal
exchange culverts, and an improved channel and outfall for the Furzebrook
Stream. The formation of permissive footpaths and screens for public to view
birds from, maintenance access tracks and the provision of associated gates,
fences, and boundary treatment works.
An update was
provided by the Case Officer as follows:
•
Environmental
Statement Chapters 1-4 will be added to condition 2 as an approved document
•
Condition 9 updated as presented
•
Condition
22 is a duplicate of condition 15 and should be a sand lizard condition as
presented.
•
An
updated HRA has been provided by the MMO requiring conditions presented instead
of conditions 23 and 24
•
Recommendation
after paragraph 15. 14.3 should read as underlined:
A) Grant permission subject to the completion of a legal
agreement under section 106 of the town and country Planning Act 1990(as
amended) in a form to be agreed by the legal services manager to secure the
following: to secure biodiversity compensation payment and the conditions noted
below.
With the aid of
visual representation, members were shown the location and design of the proposed
site. Details regarding neighbouring properties were also provided. The Case
Officer informed members that the site was predominately grassland and was
mostly owned by the RSPB. The importance of the site was discussed due to
rising sea levels, The Case Officer believed that the site had potential to
deliver environmental habitats.
Members were
informed that the appearance of the site would change from grassland to
intertidal with footpaths, viewing points, new habitats, and creeks. The most
significant change would be the embankments. The Case Officer informed members
that existing materials on the site would be used if fit for purpose to help
create the new embankments. The Case Officer informed members of the visual
impacts of the site. Members were informed that the construction period would
be approximately 3 years and a result of this led to cause temporary visual
impacts. In addition to this, traffic on local roads would also increase
throughout the construction period. The Case Officer also provided details
regarding proposed parking. Members were shown pictures of new footpaths and
the informal crossing into the permitted route. Dorset Council Highways had
been consulted and raised no concerns or objections.
The presentation
also included details regarding the significant amount of wildlife habitats
being lost. The Case Officer informed members that the loss of habitats require
compensation. Members were informed that a financial contribution would need to
be secured if approval was granted. In addition to this, members were also
informed of concerns raised regarding neighbouring amenity and noise. They were
assured that an assessment was carried out for concerns raised. The applicant
had agreed to provide noise mitigation and members were informed that this had
been secured by condition in the officer’s report.
The Case Officer
highlighted the need for the location had been established by the hold the line
policy. She discussed the benefits that the site would have on the area, in
particular the creation of wildlife and coastal habitats, prevention of
flooding from the harbour and some increase in public access to the site via
restricted permissive paths. The recommendation was to approve planning
permission subject to conditions and legal agreement to secure the required
compensation payment or refuse if legal agreement is not secured.
Public
Participation
Members of the
public and the applicant spoke in favour of application. They highlighted the
climate emergency and believed that the project would help support this. They
recognised issues raised but believed that the proposal was necessary to
protect the environment and biodiversity. The importance of the design and
planning was highlighted. Members of the public praised collaboration between
the local people and officers. They agreed that the site provides many
benefits. The applicant discussed the threat of rising sea levels and informed
members of obligations to support the environment. They hoped that members
would support the application.
The Local Ward
member, Cllr Beryl Ezzard, discussed the importance of the hold the line policy
and believes that the moors would develop this. She noted that the site was a
complex project which would have directly impacted the area. Cllr Ezzard
highlighted the importance of monitoring and reviewing in line with Arne Parish
Council comments
Members questions
and comments
· Members
praised the scheme as a good response to climate change and believed it would
become a great tourist attraction
· Concerns
regarding the limited number of parking spaces and the sufficiency of limited
disabled parking.
· Members
asked for clarification regarding connecting footpaths to the site and car
parks.
· Management
for no dog signage on the site was raised.
· It was
considered to be an effective nature reserve in a popular area.
· Mitigation
of flooding was discussed.
· Members
questioned as to whether materials taken from site would have been fit for
purpose and sufficient. The case officer advised it is anticipated to be, but a
contingency is allowed for some soil to be brought in
· References
to condition 21 were made.
· Changes
to condition 16 were made to include the wording ‘The monitoring strategy will
cover a period of a minimum of 10 years beyond completion of the development’.
Having had the
opportunity to discuss the merits of the application and an understanding of
all this entailed; having considered the officer’s report and presentation; the
written representatives; and what they had heard at the meeting, a motion to
grant was proposed by Cllr David Tooke and seconded by Cllr Robin Cook.
Decision:
A To grant planning permission subject to the completion of a legal
agreement under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
(as amended) in a form to be agreed by the legal services manager to
secure a secure biodiversity compensation payment and
conditions outlined in the officer report as amended and updated at the officer
presentation to Committee.
Supporting documents: