Installation of ground mounted photovoltaic (PV) units on galvanised steel table frameworks arranged into 12 arrays, with inverter in GRP enclosure, fencing, cameras, revised access, landscape and biodiversity mitigation
Minutes:
The Senior Planning Officer presented the application for the installation of ground mounted photovoltaic units on land west of Atrium Road.
Members were shown
the location plan of the site, displaying the boundaries of the site in
question and the surrounding area, as well as an ariel view of the site.
Landscape proposals were shown to members, indicating the planned landscape
mitigation around the border of the site, with the intention of screening views
from the North and West of the site.
The Senior Planning
Officer presented photographs of the site from various viewpoints in the
surrounding area, including a nearby public footpath.
The main planning
issues were:
·
The
impact on residential amenity was considered to be
limited due to the modest scale of the development providing no major
overbearing impact on neighbouring residential properties and a condition which
restricted the view of cameras away from properties.
·
The
effect on agricultural land was thought to be modest due to the 40 year life-span of the PV panels and the ability for the
continued use of the land for grazing.
·
There
was thought to be no major impact on local heritage sites due to the listed
buildings being situated an appropriate distance from the development.
·
There
were no objections from the Highways Department and a Traffic Management Plan
had been included with the application to mitigate impacts during the
construction phase.
Oral representation
in opposition to the application were received from Mr John Davies, Mr Clive Faircloth and Mr John Dean.
Their concerns
focused on the negative impact that the development would have on the Area of
Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), the loss of use of suitable agricultural
land and the limited benefits in terms of renewable energy production.
Oral
representations in support of the application were received from Mr Peter West,
Mr Malcom Drew and Ms Lisa Jackson, the agent for the applicant.
In response to
questions from members the Senior Planning Officer informed the committee that:
·
The
development could provide energy to around 200 homes.
·
The
site would require limited maintenance consisting of a weekly visit from an
engineer.
·
There
was no fund set aside for the decommissioning of the site after the 40-year
timeframe should the applicant no longer be trading.
·
It was
not certain that the land on the site was grade 1 agricultural land due to
there being insufficient data, however it was likely that the land was of a
high quality for agricultural use and could be reinstated for agricultural use
once the panels have been removed.
Cllr Clayton left
the Council Chamber and did not take part in the debate or vote.
Several members
expressed support for the application, noting the need to produce more energy,
particularly renewable energy and the benefits that
this would provide to the local community, in respect to rising energy bills.
One member expressed
concern over the impact on the AONB and the loss of high-grade agricultural
land should the development be approved and noted that it would be preferable
to install solar panels on existing buildings, so as not to remove agricultural
land from use.
Proposed by Cllr
Ireland and seconded by Cllr Kimber.
Decision: That
the application was granted subject to the conditions outlined in the appendix
to these minutes.
Supporting documents: