Erect 1 No. dwelling, form new vehicular access and create 1 No. parking space, (demolish existing garage).
Minutes:
With the aid of a
visual presentation, The Case Officer showed members aerial photographs and a
map of the site. Details regarding the site being near the AONB but not within
it as well as Rights of Way were also discussed. The presentation also included
photographs of the existing building, site, and proposed floor plans for the
extension. The recommendation was to grant.
Public Participation
Mr Summers spoke in
favour of the proposal. He informed members that the proposed extension would
allow for further employment and would make the workplace more efficient for a
local business. He informed members that a lot of consideration had gone into
the extension plans to ensure they would fit in with other dwellings. The
applicant also discussed the installation of solar panels if granted as well as
controlled deliveries and collections to support the local villages requests.
Mr Summers assured members that the site would only be used during normal
working hours and no chemicals were on site. He hoped members would support the
officer’s recommendation.
Mr Ebdon spoke on
behalf of the Parish Council. He informed members that the Enterprise Park was
the main employment for Piddle Valley and the Parish Council supported the
economic benefits. However, Mr Ebdon could not support the application as he
believed it was contrary to policy 10 of the neighbourhood plan and the
proposed scale of the extension would be detrimental to the visual immunity and
therefore would impact the character of the area. Concerns were also raised
regarding an increase in traffic, particularly larger vehicles. Mr Ebdon believed
that the site would be better suited for smaller businesses. He hoped members
would refuse this application.
Members questions and comments
·
Clarification regarding job creation on the site as well as whether the
proposed extension would be the tallest building on site.
· Condition to mitigate
light pollution. Prior to the commencement of any development
above foundation level, details of a lighting scheme shall have been submitted
to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter,
the lighting scheme shall be installed, operated, and maintained in accordance
with the approved scheme and there shall be no further lighting of the
development, other than in accordance with the approved scheme.
· Condition per minable
surfaces to reduce water runoff. Drainage condition for surface water. Prior
to the commencement of any development hereby approved, details of the surface
water drainage work shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the
Local Planning Authority and the approved drainage scheme shall have been
completed before the occupation of the development.
· Members were pleased to
support a growing business.
Having had the opportunity to
discuss the merits of the application and an understanding of all this
entailed; having considered the officer’s report and presentation; the written
representatives; and what they had heard at the meeting, a motion to approve
the officer’s recommendation to approve planning permission as recommended, was
proposed by Cllr Les Fry, and seconded by Cllr Carole Jones, subject to the
added conditions of lighting and drainage.
Decision: To grant subject to
conditions.
Supporting documents: