Stationing of a holiday cabin, development of a structure comprising of a cycle and refuse store, creation of an access and creation of a parking and turning area.
Minutes:
With the aid of a
visual presentation, the Case Officer explained the planning application to
members. Details including photographs of the site location, access and roof and
floor plans were discussed. The Case Officer also discussed bin and cycle
stores and provided members with details of the proposed site plan and the
design of elevations. In addition to this, details regarding sewage and waste
collection were also included. Members were informed that access would be
created by the small removal of a hedgerow.
The Case Officer’s
presentation also included details of the key issues of the site which related
to the impact of the character and appearance of the area as well as the
location of the unit. Members were also informed of two additional conditions
which referred to access closure and construction. These conditions read as
follows:
Access Closure
Before the
development is occupied or utilised the existing access point located at the
south-eastern corner of the site must be permanently closed by extending the
adjoining highway boundary and removing any gates. The existing highway
vehicular crossing must be expunged and reinstated to a specification which
must be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.
Reason: To ensure
the proper and appropriate reinstatement of the adjacent highway.
Construction
Method Statement
Prior to the
commencement of the development, a method statement that details how the mobile
structure will be placed of the site and removed from the site, and details of
all deliveries through the construction phase, such as the delivery of
construction material, shall be submitted to the local planning authority for
approval in writing. The development shall be carried out in accordance with
the approved statement.
Reason: To ensure
there is no harm to verges, hedges, or highway safety.
Steve Savage,
Transport Development Manager, informed members that the site was situated within
a typically rural Dorset Road. He clarified access to the site and informed
members that visibility splays had been secured from both directions. Mr Savage
also discussed the minimised impact on the hedgerow as well as the local cycle
route which was situated near the proposed site. He felt as though it was an
appropriate site with maximised visibility, there were no objections from
highways and supported the recommendation for approval.
Public
Participation
Both the Applicant
and Agent spoke in favour of the application. They were delighted that the
recommendation was for approval and commended the officer’s report. Mr U’Dell
and Mr Cable-Alexander discussed the environmental benefits of the proposed
site as well as informed members of the resources that would be used to
encourage biodiversity. Mr U’Dell discussed the photographs previously shown in
the officer’s presentation and explained that they allowed members to visually
see exactly what would be on offer. He described the cabin’s as modest and moveable.
Mr Cable-Alexander informed members that the business had been built due to a
love of the countryside. They also discussed a lack of adverse impacts and
hoped the members would grant the officer’s recommendation.
The Town Council
spoke in objection of the proposal. Cllr R Weeks discussed the impacts that the
proposal would have had on the local area. He raised his concerns regarding the
future of the site potentially becoming a brown field site which would have
potentially encouraged future developments. Sustainability and character of the
area were also discussed. The Town Council also raised their concerns regarding
the site being in an isolated and unsupervised location which would be heavily
reliant on vehicles. Cllr R Weeks also spoke of the impacts that the proposed
site would have on nature and did not feel that there were enough benefits to
outweigh the harm. He hoped members would reconsider the officer’s
recommendation.
Members
questions and comments
·
Any scheme to reinstate hedging and
plantation.
·
Clarification regarding use of site
access.
·
Questions regarding implementation of
additional conditions to reduce change of use.
·
Clarification regarding permanence and
materials used of the proposed cabin.
·
No significant planning reasons to object
to the application.
·
Members praised the proposal.
·
Seeked clarification from planning
officers regarding brown field site concerns.
Cllr Jespersen
adjourned the meeting to seek clarification from the agent regarding materials
used for the proposed cabin.
Having had the opportunity to discuss the merits of the
application and an understanding of all this entailed; having considered the
officer’s report and presentation; the written representatives; and what they
had heard at the meeting, a motion to approve the officer’s
recommendation to grant planning permission as recommended, was proposed by Cllr Les Fry and seconded by Cllr David Taylor.
Decision: To approve the officer’s recommendation to grant subject to conditions.
Supporting documents: