An application has been made by Dorset Police to review the premises licence at the Eats and Drinks store in Weymouth. A Licensing Sub Committee must consider the application and representations from all parties at a public hearing.
Minutes:
The Licensing Team Leader introduced the report to review a
premises licence brought by Dorset Police. The licence was for off sales of
alcohol between 7.00 and 23.00 hours every day and there were no conditions on
the licence apart from mandatory conditions.
Sargeant Gosling on behalf of Dorset Police addressed the
Sub-Committee. He explained that he had helped Kirsty Gatehouse manage the
premises in regard to providing advice and had visited the premises multiple
times. It was a difficult area to operate however, Dorset Police had high
expectations of all licensees to ensure that the licensing objectives were
promoted but felt that these had not been upheld fully over the past
months/years. As there were established practices that did not uphold the
licensing objectives and had a detrimental impact on the town.
In response to questions from Cllr Les Fry regarding what
actions had been taken. Kirsty Gatehouse responded that before concerns had
been raised by local hoteliers, the review was in process. Dorset Police heard
concerns outside of the time when people could make their own representations.
The complaints pertained to lots of people hanging around outside the shop that
were sometimes intoxicated and abusive. Dorset Police last summer went around
to all of the convenience stores and informed them of the issues that were
occurring to do with alcohol related antisocial behaviour. She explained that
Eats and Drinks was quite reluctant to make lasting changes as they believed
lots of people wanted to buy single cans of alcohol. The street drinking
community that caused most of the antisocial behaviour were often homeless and
struggle financially and made most of their money through begging, finding or
stealing. It was easier to buy single cans of strong alcohol at a time and go
back and forth when they acquired money. She had visited a number of times last
year and spoken to Jay and his wife about the issues that they were
experiencing. They did not fully appreciate the concerns that were raised. At
the end of November last year, the Police Cadets conducted a purchasing
exercise and Eats and Drinks did not pass this test purchase, in which a
warning was sent out. But she did not want this to be taken into consideration
by the Sub-Committee.
Mr Rajesh on behalf of the licence holder addressed the
Sub-Committee. He explained that the test purchase conducted by the Police
Cadets was the exception as all the other tests by trading standards had
passed. Mr Jayasuthan had operated the business for 22 years and Ms Jayasuthan
owns the business. They knew all the customers and the premises played a big
role in the local community and engaged in local charities and events. During
lockdown the premises offered free home deliveries to vulnerable people.
The Sub-Committee adjourned at 11.15 for the Police to consider
if they accepted the additional information submitted by Mr Rajesh.
The Sub-Committee resumed at 11.45 and the Police agreed to
accept the additional information submitted.
The Sub-Committee adjourned at 11.47 in order for the Cllrs
to consider the additional information.
The Sub-Committee resumed at 12.01. All parties agreed to
accept the additional information.
Mr Rajesh made the committee aware that the business was
well managed and that they listened to all the requests by the Police to stop
selling strong strength alcohol. He explained the 2 allegations of serving
intoxicated persons in which the man visited the premises in the morning to buy
alcohol and was not drunk. He then came back at 11.30 and was intoxicated. The
premises did not serve the person when he returned. The individual had been
banned previously from the premises for a long time and was a troubled person
and even when banned, he visited the premises and often made threats. He added
that if the Police kept troublesome people away from the area, then there would
be no problems. He addressed the allegations of handling stolen goods. There
was only one shop employee working at the time, and the man went straight to
the toilet, the staff noticed that the customer walked towards the toilet
without asking, so he followed him, and then he wanted to change a £20 note.
The Police were provided with CCTV footage, and he believed there had been no
illegal activity. He had asked officers to produce a supplement with evidence
of allegations, but nothing was put forward.
Ms Jayasuthan spoke about the improvements that had been
made in the shop and about the allegations which caused stress and increased
shop lifting. Mr Jayasuthan informed the toilet would no longer be used by
people in the shop and that he had full confidence in his staff. In response to
Police questions, he explained that high strength alcohol ceased being sold
after COVID and could only be bought based on request.
A vote to extend the meeting was taken at 13.30 as the
duration of the meeting had passed 3 hours.
Propose by Cllr Les Fry, seconded Cllr Louise Bown.
Decision: To extend the duration of the meeting.
Sargeant Gosling made the committee aware that it was the
first-time hearing reference to a toilet in the back and people using it.
Mr Rajesh responded that he did not have time to inform the
police as he was too busy preparing for the Licensing Committee and did not
know the full information.
All parties were given the opportunity to have their say and
sum up.
Decision:
·
To add the following conditions in addition to the Mandatory Conditions
(set out below) to the Premises Licence:
1.
All sales of alcohol for consumption off the Premises shall be in sealed
containers only and shall not be consumed on the Premises.
2.
No beers, ciders or lagers of 5.5% ABV (alcohol by volume) or above
shall be sold at the Premises.
3.
No single cans or glass bottles of beer, cider, lager or alcopops shall
be sold, with the exception of those in cans or bottles in excess of 500ml in
volume.
4.
The minimum number of cans of beers, ciders, lagers or alcopops less
than 500ml in volume purchased in one transaction will be four.
5.
All spirits will be displayed behind the counter.
6.
No miniature bottles of spirits of 20cl or below shall be sold from the
premises.
7.
No sign or advertisement shall be displayed outside the premises that
advertises the price of any alcoholic product.
8.
Challenge 25 shall be operated at the Premises where the only acceptable
forms of identification are recognised photographic identification cards, such
as a driving licence or passport, or holographically marked PASS scheme
identification cards.
9.
Appropriate signage advising customers of the Challenge 25 policy shall
be prominently displayed in the Premises.
10.
A log shall be kept detailing all refused sales of alcohol. The refusals
log should include the date and time of the refused sale, a description of the
person refused, why they were refused (eg no ID, fake ID) and the name of the
member of staff who refused the sale.
11.
The record shall be checked by the Designated Premises Supervisor at
least once a week and shall be signed to that effect. This refusals record
shall be kept on the premises and shall be available for inspection by the
Police or an authorised officer of the Council at all times whilst the Premises
is open.
12.
A Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) system will be operational at the
Premises at all times when licensable activities are being carried out and at
any other times when members of the public are present on the premises. The CCTV system
must cover all areas of the premises including the area outside the toilet. The
CCTV system will contain the correct time and date stamp information and will
have sufficient storage retention capacity for a minimum of 31 days of
continuous footage. Weekly checks will be made and documented to ensure the
system is functioning as required and all details are correct, including the
time and date shown.
13.
CCTV shall be downloaded on request of the Police or authorised officer
of the Council.
14.
A staff member who is conversant with the operation of the CCTV system
will be on the Premises at all times when the Premises is open to the public.
15.
Appropriate signage advising customers of CCTV being in operation, shall
be prominently displayed in the Premises.
16.
All staff involved in the sale of alcohol shall receive training on the
Licensing Objectives, the law relating to prohibited sales, the age
verification policy adopted by the Premises and the conditions attached to the
Premises Licence. Refresher training shall be provided at least once every six
months. A record shall be maintained of all staff training and that record
shall be signed and dated by the person receiving the training and the trainer.
The records shall be kept for a minimum of 12 months and made available for
inspection by Police, Licensing or other authorised officers.
17. Incident Log
(a) any complaints received
(b) any incidents of disorder
(c) any faults in the CCTV system
(d) any refusal
of the sale of alcohol
(e) any visit by a relevant authority
or emergency service
(f) all crimes reported to the venue
(g) all ejections of customers
This log to be checked and signed on a weekly basis by the Designated Premises Supervisor.
18. The toilet at the premises shall be used only by staff and not by
members of the public and shall be kept locked when not in use.
Mandatory conditions
1. Supply of Alcohol
(s19(2)&(3))
No supply of alcohol may be made under the
premises licence –
(a)
at a time when there is no designated
premises supervisor, or
(b)
at a time when the designated premises
supervisor does not hold a personal licence or his personal licence has been
suspended.
Every supply of alcohol under the premises licence must be made or
authorised by a person who holds a personal licence.
2. (1)
The premises licence holder or club premises certificate holder must ensure
that an age verification policy is adopted in respect of the premises in
relation to the sale or supply of alcohol.
(2) The
designated premises supervisor in relation to the premises licence must ensure
that the supply of alcohol at the premises is carried on in accordance with the
age verification policy.
(3) The policy
must require individuals who appear to the responsible person to be under 18
years of age (or such older age as may be specified in the policy) to produce
on request, before being served alcohol, identification bearing their
photograph, date of birth and either—
(a) a
holographic mark, or
(b) an
ultraviolet feature.
3. A relevant person shall ensure that no
alcohol is sold or supplied for consumption on or off the premises for a price
which is less than the permitted price.
4. For
the purposes of the condition set out in paragraph 3—
(a) “duty” is to be construed in accordance with the Alcoholic Liquor
Duties Act 1979;
(b) “permitted price” is the price found by applying the formula— P=D+(DxV)
where—
(i)
P is the permitted price,
(ii)
D is the amount of duty chargeable in relation to the alcohol as if the
duty were charged on the date of the sale or supply of the alcohol, and
(iii) V
is the rate of value added tax chargeable in relation to the alcohol as if the
value added tax were charged on the date of the sale or supply of the alcohol;
(c) “relevant person” means, in relation to premises in respect of which
there is in force a premises licence—
(i) the
holder of the premises licence,
(ii)
the designated premises supervisor (if any) in respect of such a licence, or
(iii) the
personal licence holder who makes or authorises a supply of alcohol under such
a licence;
(d)“relevant person” means, in relation to premises in respect of which
there is in force a club premises certificate, any member or officer of the
club present on the premises in a capacity which enables the member or officer
to prevent the supply in question; and
(e) “value added tax” means value added tax charged in accordance with the
Value Added Tax Act 1994.
5. Where the permitted price given by
Paragraph (b) of paragraph 4 would (apart from this paragraph) not be a whole number
of pennies, the price given by that sub-paragraph shall be taken to be the
price actually given by that sub-paragraph rounded up to the nearest penny.
6. (1) Sub-paragraph (2) applies
where the permitted price given by Paragraph (b) of paragraph 4 on a day (“the
first day”) would be different from the permitted price on the next day (“the
second day”) as a result of a change to the rate of duty or value added tax.
(2) The permitted price which would apply on the
first day applies to sales or supplies of alcohol which take place before the
expiry of the period of 14 days beginning on the second day.
Also,
to remove the Designated Premises Supervisor.
Supporting documents: