To consider a report by the Corporate Director for Finance and Commercial (Section 151 Officer).
Minutes:
The Corporate Director for Finance and Commercial (Section
151 Officer) introduced the Budget and Medium-Term Financial Plan (MTFP). The
proposed net revenue budget for 2026/27 was £482.6m. The underlying cost
pressure was approximately £37m, the pressures in the proposed budget were
addressed through a range of efficiencies, savings, grants and income. The proposed
budget presented a balanced budget to the council.
The Committee discussed the report and asked questions of
the Section 151 Officer, Cabinet Members, and relevant directors. Non-committee
members were also given the opportunity to ask questions. Each of the
appendices relevant to the committee’s remit were discussed in-turn, following
an introduction from the senior officer responsible for the service.
Appendix 1d – Adults and Housing
The demand in adult social care was predicted to continue
rising, although it was not expected to increase above the growth included in
the budget. Pressures on the wider system could create pressure on the budget.
Savings were to be achieved during the year.
The following points were raised during discussion on the
Adults and Housing budget:
·
Whether the FutureCare savings target was
realistic. The Executive Director for Adults and Housing was very confident for
that these savings would be made.
·
A 3% vacancy factor was expected to be built
into the budget. Recruitment for social workers was a challenge but vacancies
for these posts were not deliberately held.
·
The unfunded staffing posts pressure in housing
were being extended into this financial year as they were on a 2-year basis but
were needed to continue investment and transformation in housing.
·
With regards to the council’s transport offer
and making savings, the Executive Director advised the council was looking at
more cost-efficient ways of funding this, such as using more direct payments.
Appendix 1e – Children’s Services
There was a 5.7% increase in the Children’s Services budget
with £3.5m of pressures from pay increases and inflation. The largest pressure
was the children in care placement budget. The budget included a £1.5m
investment into fostering and kinship care, which was the least expensive
option for children in care.
The following points were raised during the Children’s
Services budget discussion:
·
There was a concern from the committee about the
council’s High Needs Block deficit. The Section 151 Officer advised this was a
national issue and the government planned to introduce a SEND white paper which
would set out policy reform options. The council was managing SEND well and
there may be additional funding in the final settlement.
·
A specific timeline was not attached to the
introduction of AI. Additional capacity from remodelling the service, along
with using AI to support staff, would mean the council does not need to rely on
agency staff. The Transformation Management Office were reviewing the options
for the implementation of AI.
Appendix 1f – Birth to Settled Adulthood
There had been significant growth in the budget for Birth to
Settled Adulthood to reflect the service need. The service should help prevent
growth in need and supporting children to stay with families. Some cost
avoidance has been achieved through accommodation for young adults.
The following points were raised during the discussion:
·
The Dorset Parent Carer Council was praised for
their involvement in developing the Birth to Settled Adulthood service.
·
There was concern about the increasing demand
and overspend for the service and £1 million savings had not been achieved. The
Corporate Director for Adult Care Operations advised that financial benefits
from Birth to Settled Adulthood would take time and would develop as a person
matures into adulthood. There was evidence that the approach was making a
difference, and this was recognised by the Dorset Parent Carer Council.
·
Birth to Settled Adulthood has helped Adult
Social Care to forecast their future demand. However, there were targets in the
health system to reduce spending which could have impacts on social care
budgets and performance in the future.
Appendix 1h – Public Health and Prevention
There were no questions or discussion following an
introduction by the Director of Public Health and Prevention.
It was noted earlier in the meeting that there was a small
uplift in the ringfenced Public Health grant and that some other funding
streams had been consolidated into this grant. Some pressures had emerged
following the transfer of some services from the Place directorate; however,
the Director was confident that the service could remain within budget.
At the end of the discussion, the Chairman summed up and
reenforced the need for clear contingencies within the budget, with pressures
caused by increasing demand and unachieved savings.
The Committee made the following recommendation to Cabinet:
Recommendation: That Cabinet clarifies what
contingency and resilience exists in the proposed 2026/27 budget should
pressures exceed assumptions.
Supporting documents: