Erect 316 No. dwellings with associated open space, access, sustainable urban drainage, and infrastructure. (Phase 1 Reserved Matters application to determine appearance, landscaping, layout and scale; following the grant of Outline Planning Permission No. 2/2018/0077/OUT).
Minutes:
With the aid of a
visual presentation including plans and aerial photographs, the Case Officer
identified the site and explained the proposal and relevant planning policies to
members. Photographs of the outline location plan and the illustrative master
plan was shown to the Committee. She corrected typos in Section 4 of the report
under key planning issues; 32 units were proposed for affordable housing and 16
were shared ownership not 17. There would be 10% affordable housing, and the
plans provided sufficient garden space. There would be 706 parking spaces and
259 located in garages. Some changes had been made to the layout with
consultation with highways. The council flood risk management team raised no
objections to the strategy. Energy saving methods were incorporated into the
site, with low water use and low-e double glazing, and sustainable drainage.
Climate change adaptation measures had been implemented to achieve reduction in
co2 emissions by 60%. Significant existing trees were maintained throughout and
new trees planted. The opportunities for biodiversity were maximised. The great
crested newt habitat was maintained, and a series of bird boxes, hedgehog
highways and bat boxes were widely spread across the site. There was courtyard
surveillance in areas and there were no material considerations that would
warrant refusal of the application.
Public
Participation
There was no public
participation.
Members
questions and comments
·
A comment was made about how trees were
going to be protected
·
Clarification was sought that EV chargers
would be installed at all properties and all spaces not just garages.
·
Questions were asked if solar panels would
be installed on properties, and what were the road materials made
out of and questions about run off and drainage.
·
A question was asked how many dwellings
were disabled friendly as in widened doorway as there were no bungalows. Where
was the site going to have meeting point or fete, and that there was no place
together or village hall.
·
Comments made about the low number of
affordable housings which should be 30% not 10%.
·
Comments were made that they were happy
with streetlights and planning officers had worked hard on this application.
The case officer,
Kirsten Williams commented that the layout of the site was very strong. The
Tree officer reviewed the development and identified smaller species to use
across the site and there was a condition that if any trees died, they had to
be replaced and would be the responsibility of whoever owned the land. Solar panels would be installed on dwellings.
All homes needed to be accessible as per building regulations and there was no
specific regulation for homes to be fully adaptable. All doors must be a
minimum and specific dimension for accessibility. The scheme had been reviewed
by the highways department. The parking provision was generous in the
Courtyard, and most people would walk and cycle rather than drive. The Safety
of water features, designed to appropriate standard and levels, both positioned
natural surveillance over them. The developer was not required to achieve
biodiversity net gain, but the applicant sought to achieve that. There was no
community hall on site, but a financial contribution was secured on the outline
application.
Having had the
opportunity to discuss the merits of the application and an understanding of
all this entailed; having considered the officer’s report and presentation; the
written representatives; and what they had heard at the meeting, a motion to APPROVE
the officer’s recommendation to GRANT planning permission as
recommended, was proposed by Cllr Ridout , and seconded by Cllr Val Pothecary.
Decision: To grant
planning permission with conditions set out in the officer’s report and
outlined in the appendix of the minutes.
Supporting documents: