Construction of a detached chalet bungalow.
Minutes:
The
Committee agreed to extend the meeting beyond three hours.
The
Development Management Team Leader presented the application for the erection
of a dwelling, with the location of the site shown within Bere Regis. Site
constraints were displayed on a map and it was noted that land adjacent to the
site was owned by Dorset Council.
Photographs
of the site and its access were shown, confirming that the land was in private
ownership and enclosed on both sides. Additional photographs illustrated views
of the site looking towards the school.
Existing
and proposed site plans were presented, showing a single bungalow with two
parking spaces and a garden area. It was highlighted that the Council did not
have a five-year land supply so the tilted balance in favour of development
applied. The proposal was considered infill development that was not out of
keeping with the area. The slope of the site would allow the bungalow to sit
comfortably within wider views. Proposed elevations were shown, with a hipped
roof design reflecting other properties on Egdon
Close. Floor plans and roof plans were also displayed.
The
proposal was assessed as causing no loss of amenity or light. The window would
only allow oblique views of the school and neighbouring gardens, so no adverse
impact on amenity was expected. A condition would require that the bathroom
window be obscure glazed and another condition required the rooflight above the
stairwell to be non-opening and obscure glazed, with permitted development
rights removed for further windows.
A
proposed surface water drainage plan was submitted. Although the site was not
at risk of flooding, there was flooding nearby. The drainage plan offered
potential betterment and biodiversity enhancement and soft landscaping would be
required by condition, along with Community Infrastructure Levy contributions.
Highway
safety and parking were considered, with engineers raising no issues and noting
that vehicle movements would be fewer than previous uses. Accessibility for
fire and emergency vehicles was discussed, as the width of the access did not
meet the 3.7 metres required for a fire engine to reverse into the site.
Compliance with building regulations would be necessary and the agent had
confirmed that a sprinkler system would be installed to ensure compliance.
The
loss of off-street parking was raised, as the application site had previously
been used for resident parking. It was acknowledged that residents were
concerned about this loss, but alternative parking had been provided and the
ownership of the land was now in different hands. Seven alternative payable
licenced spaces had been provided by Aster, which was considered sufficient to
offset the loss.
Matthew
Holmes spoke as the agent for the application. He noted that the site would
provide a similar sized plot to other homes in the area and the scheme also
offered biodiversity enhancements on site. He stated that the development was
well designed and in keeping with the area and that residential amenity would
be protected through the proposed conditions.
Officers
provided the following responses to members questions:
·
The 7 parking spaces provided to the east of Egdon
Close were not free to use.
·
Access to the neighbours gate would be a matter of land law for the
parties to decide.
·
There was previously a garage block on the site of the 7 parking
spaces.
·
The Construction Management plan would require hours of working to be
submitted for approval.
It
was proposed by Cllr Sowry-House and seconded by Cllr Hobbs-Chell, that the
application be approved.
Decision:
That the application be granted subject to the conditions set out in the
appendix to these minutes.
Supporting documents: