To set out the Police and Crime Commissioner’s proposals for the 2026/27 budget and precept.
Minutes:
Following the late
receipt of a full set of financial figures to the Office of the Police &
Crime Commissioner (OPCC) the Chairman commended the Chief Finance Officer,
Julie Strange, for preparing the budget report in such challenging
circumstances. The Chairman reminded
members of the panel of the statutory rules regarding the decision to be taken;
the panel could either support the precept proposal, support the precept and
request further information for the July panel meeting precept, support the
precept proposal with the additional option to veto the proposal (which would
require 8 members to vote against the proposed precept and the panel would meet
again on 19th February 2026).
The Police and Crime
Commissioner (PCC) introduced the budget which was seeking an increase in the
precept of £15 per annum, it had been a difficult budget setting period and
there was a need to balance the need to keep people in Dorset safe against not wanting
to ask for additional funding. The PCC paid tribute to his staff for all of the hard work that had gone into producing the
budget. To provide the panel with all of the salient information required to make a decision on the budget the PCC asked Amanda Pearson,
Chief Constable, Julie Strange, Chief Finance Officer and Adam Harrold,
Director of Operations to make presentations to the panel.
(00:22:12 on
recording)
The Chief Constable,
Amanda Pearson, provided a comprehensive oversight in respect of the operation
aspect of policing, the achievements of the previous year, the reductions in
budget already achieved and the ongoing commitment to continuous improvement and
seeking further opportunities through the use of technology, income generation,
reductions in staff posts, utility costs, vehicle running costs and software.
However, it had got to the point where the workforce could not be asked to do
more, their resilience had been stretched to the limit and there was a need to
stabilise workforce and maintain the level of policing; the service to the
public could not be maintained without the increase of £15 to the precept.
(00:58:56 on
recording)
The Chief Finance
Officer, (CFO) Julie Strange, provided an overview of the budget provided to
the Panel and confirmed that since the publication of the report no further
information had been received so the report remained accurate and was up to
date. The CFO confirmed that the budget being put forward to the panel was a
balanced budget and provided assurance that the budget was robust and that the
overall level of reserves was adequate.
(01:02:28 on
recording)
The Director of
Operations, Adam Harrold, providing a presentation to the panel on the public
consultation exercise that had been undertaken between 27th November
2025 and 26th January 2026, details of which were set out in the
budget paper.
At that point the
PCC invited questions from members of the panel; the questions and responses
are attached at Appendix 2 to these minutes.
The Chairman closed
the question and answer session at 11.45am. Cllr Rampton asked a question on
process for clarification, in response Simon Bullock, Chief Executive confirmed
that the decision of the panel was to support or not support the budget; further
clarification on the budget proposals could be provided at the next panel
meeting in July. Cllr Canavan expressed
his concerns in respect of not understanding the consequences and not knowing
the full impact of the decision on communities.
Jonathan Mair, Dorset Council Monitoring Officer advised the panel that
they had to make a decision based on the information
provided with the agenda papers, if the panel did not support the budget the
panel would need to meet again to consider an alternative precept.
The budget
recommendation was put to the vote: -
|
To
lobby the Government for a fair deal for Dorset (Resolution) |
|
|
Councillor
Alasdair Keddie |
For |
|
Councillor Louise
Bown |
For |
|
Councillor Patrick
Canavan |
Against |
|
Councillor David
Flagg |
For |
|
Councillor Simon
Gibson |
For |
|
Councillor Louie
O'Leary |
For |
|
Councillor Karen
Rampton |
For |
|
Councillor Peter
Sidaway |
For |
|
Councillor Carl
Woode |
For |
|
Carried |
|
Decision
That the PCC’s proposal
to increase the precept for 2026/27 to £102,014,893, equivalent to a Band D
charge of £322.58, an increase of £15 per annum or £1.25 per month (4.88%), as
set out in Appendix 5 of the report be approved.
Following the vote
the PCC asked the panel to write to the Home Secretary in support of a review
of the national funding formula as the current formula for police funding did
not work for rural police forces. The PCC
was seeking support from all partner organisations to request a national review
of funding and to address the issues of seasonal pressures and rurality.
Members of the Panel
discussed whether to write a letter in support of the Police and Crime
Commissioner’s (PCC) lobbying of the Government for a fairer funding formula
for Dorset. Members expressed the view that it was important to secure
cross-party support on the issue and to pursue a review to ensure that rural
police forces were properly funded under any revised model.
Councillor S. Gibson
proposed that a recorded vote be taken. This proposal was supported by a
majority of the Panel. The Chair noted that securing a fair deal for Dorset had
been a recurring theme for the Panel.
The Chair recognised
and noted the efforts of Dorset Members of Parliament in supporting the PCC’s
lobbying of the Home Office.
The Chair also noted
that the Panel had previously agreed on the need to write a letter of support
from the Panel to the Home Office regarding securing a fair funding settlement
for Dorset.
On being put to the
vote the motion was CARRIED.
Decision
That the panel write
to the Home Secretary in support of the PCC’s lobbying to review the national
funding formula to achieve a fairer deal for Dorset.
The Chairman asked for
volunteers from the panel to form an informal working group to draft the
letter; Cllr Keddie, Cllr Gibson and Cllr Woode put themselves forward.
At that point
(12.27pm) the panel took a short 10-minute comfort break.
Supporting documents: