To consider the final report and recommendations of the committee’s working group on Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCP’s).
(Report to follow)
Minutes:
The Chairman introduced and presented the report of the
committee’s EHCP Working Group. The working group was established in October
2024, following the committee raising concerns about the timeliness of
Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs). She outlined the processes that the
working group took to investigate the issues. This included establishing an
inquiry day, followed by further meetings with parents of children with an
EHCP, and with NHS representatives. The Chairman thanked everyone who took part
in giving evidence to the working group and thanked the panel members for their
involvement. The Chairman outlined the recommendations in the report.
The Executive Director for Children’s Services responded to
the report and made the following points:
·
He believed that there should be more nuance in
the report, particularly around what parents say, because not all parents give
the same feedback.
·
He did not believe that council’s rate of
tribunals were high.
·
Many of the issues captured in the report
reflected national issues, which was caused by a system which was not
financially sustainable, leading to children’s experiences not improving.
·
The council’s performance in the percentage of
EHCP’s issued within 20 weeks had improved from 22% in September 2025 to 54% in
March 2026. There was an aspiration for issuing all EHCP’s within 20 weeks, but
this was not likely to be achieved.
·
It was a professional decision by the Executive
Director for the working group to not speak directly with children. However he
offered working group an opportunity to work with the Youth Voice team, which
was not accepted by the working group.
The Chairman responded to the Executive Director for
Children’s Services. She agreed that there should have been more context in the
report with regards to national issues, however the report reflected the
evidence the working group received. The working group wanted the best outcomes
for Dorset children and felt that most issues that were raised were caused by
communication.
Members of the committee asked questions discussed the
report. The following points were raised through the questions and discussion:
·
A member noted that children who had an EHCP
were not afraid to express their opinions.
·
Good improvements had been made over the past
several months, but was progress slowing down? The Executive Director for Children’s
Services responded that progress was due to remodelling the locality model to
increase capacity, although the full change had not been made yet. Using AI in
EHCP’s was also being introduced which created improvements in other local
authorities, therefore further improvements to timeliness were anticipated.
·
In response to a question about the form of
communication the council receives from families, the Executive Director
explained this often included written, legal, or challenging communication to
him. All families had a named caseworker and communication with the caseworker
would take a variety of forms. A phone line with booked appointments had been
trialled in a locality and had very limited take up.
·
Dorset Council could make its own improvements
to communication, however was the council limited due to communication
improvements also being needed in the NHS? The Place Director for Dorset,
representing the Integrated Care Board, accepted their part in needing to make
improvements to communication. He also explained that changes were being made
around waiting lists and the processes for assessing it.
·
During the 20 weeks to issue an EHCP, it could
be very challenging to complete all the administration, organisation, and
getting the responses required from organisations to contribute to the EHCP. It
could also be challenging to respond to some frequent communication from some
families.
·
At 20 weeks, it was the end of the beginning for
children with an EHCP. It was good that schools were being recognised as the
front line, which was critical for meaningful improvement.
The Executive Director for Children’s Services commented on
the Schools White Paper. He explained that the white paper had caused some
anxiety for parents, however it had been quite well received by most parties
involved. The council had received notification that it would receive some
Government funding for creating an ‘expert at hand service’ in mainstream
provision. The Council would develop a SEND Reform Plan which would set out how
the council would use the funding.
Proposed by Cllr J Somper, seconded by Cllr C Jones.
Upon being put to the vote, the committee unanimously agreed
the report and recommendations and that they be submitted to Cabinet for
response.
Decision:
That the report and recommendations be agreed and submitted
to Cabinet for a response.
Supporting documents: