Minutes:
Update Sheet
Rights of Way
Application
Application
Ref. |
Application
address |
Agenda
ref. |
Page no. |
- |
Application to divert
Footpath 51, Dorchester and
Footpath 6, Winterborne Monkton |
5 |
5 onwards |
Receipt of views from Councillor Roland Tarr - Winterborne
and Broadmayne Ward member “Thank you for
your invitation to this meeting, received by us, as Ward Councillors. The Mayor of
Dorchester, Ward Member for Poundbury, and I, are in Bayeux, Dorchester’s Partner
Town, at the invitation of the Mayor of Bayeux, from this Friday. On Monday
morning we shall be laying wreaths by the graves of those local people who
died during the recapture of the town by the Dorset Regiment at the end of
the last war. We both wish to
send our apologies but should be grateful if our views could be read to the
committee at a suitable time during the meeting. The future of
non-motorised access from the villages around Dorchester for children who
come to our schools in the town as well as those who work in the town and
commute from those villages is a very topical, and we are currently in
discussion with the Duchy about this. I taught at
Hardyes for ten years, and students from the villages were unable to join in
with many of the after-school activities which are organised for them -
sporting, extra catch-up classes for exams, drama and music for example,
because there has never been any safe usable cycling provision for returning
after the school buses leave at 3.45pm. Likewise, by way
of example, hospital staff who like to cycle to work from the villages west
of Poundbury either have to cycle through a filthy farmyard and
dismount to open multiple gates or brave a very nasty roundabout across
a fast and heavily trafficked trunk road. As a council we
should surely be planning to resolve these problems by discussion, and not
closing existing rights of way without looking at the overall situation. The two Ward
Councillors would therefor ask the Strategic Planning Committee to familiarise
themselves with the new path and old on Monday, but defer a final decision
until further discussions have been held with the Duchy, and the tenants, who
have recently indicated a wish to discuss possible mutually beneficial
solutions. I should also
mention that local walkers park near the western, Monkeys Jump, end of this
path for short early morning and evening walks on their way to and from work
and enjoy the superb views of Maiden Castle which it affords. I realise that the
closure of this path may seem irrelevant to the general problem of lack of
access for our rural population, as described above, but if it is humanly
possible my preference would be for a decision on the footpath closure by our
Strategic Planning Committee to be deferred pending further discussions
between the Duchy , the tenants and the very new Dorset Council. If we are as a
Council to aim to meet our current Green commitments I believe a strategic
approach to those problems and opportunities is vital. Yours Roland” ……………………………………………………….. Officer’s response
- Carol McKay - to Cllr Tarr’s email of 17 September 2019:- “The issues raised
by Cllr Tarr are applicable to the wider matter of provision for cyclists and
walkers in the Poundbury / Dorchester area and these matters cannot be
considered under the legal tests for Public Path Diversion Orders. However a
decision on the footpath diversion does not prejudice the outcome of any
future talks with the Duchy regarding public access. The proposed
diversion concerns public footpaths and provides a new route for walkers only
(this includes mobility scooters etc). Cyclists will not
be permitted on the proposed new route. There is no legal obligation for a
landowner to upgrade a diverted footpath to bridleway. Although cycling
provision is not relevant to the proposed footpath diversion, Dorset Council
officers are happy to enter into discussions with the Duchy to improve public
access in the area. “ 19/09/2019 |