Erection of 66 dwellings and associated works.
Minutes:
Cllr Penfold left the meeting for this item.
The Senior Planning Officer introduced the
outline application for the erection of 66 dwellings and associated works.
Members were shown a site location plan and advised that the principle of
residential development had been agreed at an outline stage and that the
proposal would result in less than substantial harm to the nearby Grade II
listed barn. This harm would be
outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal, in terms of the provision of
dwellings, including affordable homes.
The design of the dwellings had been
improved through negotiation and the principle buildings fronting towards the
listed building would employ natural stone to their exterior elevations.
The Planning team had received an objection
from Sherborne Town Council which had now been addressed.
The applicant’s Biodiversity Mitigation and
Enhancement Plan had not yet been agreed by the Dorset Natural Environment Team
but this was expected shortly. As such,
the Area Lead proposed an amendment to the recommendation to account for this
and allow changes to Condition 12
The Planning team had received one objection
from Sherborne Town Council which had now been addressed.
The Senior Planning Officer proposed an
amendment to the recommendation to be subject to comments being received from
the Dorset Natural Development teams on the bio diversity mitigation plan and
to condition12 being updated, all of the following conditions remained.
Mr Christopher Perfect, resident of Barton
Farm spoke objecting to the application. Mr Perfect advised members he was a
homeowner at Barton Farm, in Phase 1 of the development which was built 3 years
ago. He strongly objected to application in that the proposed 2 storey property
at unit 33 was immediately opposite his property. It would be 12.5 metres from his property in
respect of full height windows and balconies and views and light would be
compromised, in effect his property would be completely overlooked and
therefore urged the Committee to refuse permission.
As Cllr Matthew Hall was unable to attend
the meeting, Cllr Jon Andrews read out a statement from him objecting to the
application. His comments included that
whilst he welcomed the number of affordable homes he felt the spread across the
phase was inadequate. He had issues with
the proposed tree planting, the current infrastructure not being sufficient,
obstruction of views and loss of light for existing properties, the narrow road
network and the sustainability of the site. He would like to see a condition in
place that required the developer to use one are of open space for a toddler’s
play area.
Suzanne Knowles speaking on behalf of the
applicant, highlighted that 23 units would be affordable. She advised that they had worked with the
Local Authority in respect of this proposed development and had also worked
closely with the design officer and with the Sherborne Conservation Team.
Additional information regarding flooding and drainage was highlighted.
Highways officers had not raised any objections. Whilst there had been several
concerns regarding existing green spaces there had not been any objections from
Natural England.
Comments from
Members are detailed below:-
·
There
was a concern about the loss of open space and the Senior Planning Officer
highlighted the public open space proposed for this phase and noted that in the
near future additional open space would be provided. He also drew members’ attention to the
ecological survey. A further concern was
raised about the potential lack of open spaces and how it would have been
helpful to have a steer from the Natural Environment Team in this regard. The
Senior Planning Officer advised that officers were waiting for their comments
as a consultee but confirmed these had now been received.
·
Provision
of car parking was highlighted and the Senior Planning Officer was satisfied
that parking could be accommodated to a reasonable extent.
·
Reference
was made to the loss of hedgerows and the Senior Panning Officer confirmed that
the ancient hedge was being preserved as shown in the presentation and that
enforcement officers were content that the hedge was being retained. He acknowledged that through previous applications
the hedge had not been protected in its entirety.
·
Concern
was expressed about rendered buildings as in a few years the render becomes
discoloured and crackles and can become unsightly. Members asked that an additional condition be
added that stipulates that there is no render on exterior walls.
·
There
was a discussion on affordable housing, 23 units were proposed in this phase
and members were concerned as to how the retention of rented properties would
be sustained.
·
One
member following a visit to the site felt the play area was of poor quality and
asked if one could be included, specifically for younger children.
·
In
respect of previous phases officers confirmed that the applicant had fulfilled
previous conditions and worked reasonably well with officers.
·
Concern
was expressed that the main road through the estate was quite narrow and
questioned if there was enough room for emergency vehicles to pass
through. The Senior Planning Officer
advised that highways engineers were content and had no objections to the
proposals.
·
Following
a question about whether the drainage was satisfactory, the Senior Planning
Officer advised it would be for Wessex Water to address any issues that might
arise.
·
One member
asked that with regards to the barn particular attention be given to bats as
there were a significant number of bats there.
·
In
respect of building materials, one member reflected that the site had a history
of changing roofing materials in particular and would be content if there were
no red tiles used at all. The Senior
planning Officer felt that this might be a bit onerous as the rest of the
development had been allowed to receive a mix of tiles. However, they could
push for a different colour reference in condition 5 and add wording to the
condition to avoid red/pink tiles.
Cllr Jon Andrews felt that the reasons for
recommendations were a subjective point of view. Affordable houses needed to be
social rented houses otherwise they ended up freehold and subsequently
sold. He applauded the fact that there
was 35% affordable housing proposed and wanted to see it remain. The schools were full in Sherborne and he was
concerned where children would go.
Doctors surgeries were also under pressure and he felt that the
infrastructure was not in place and therefore could not support the
application.
Cllr Robin Legg proposed an amendment to
recommendation B, as outlined in the report, that the Section 106 came back to
Committee for approval within 6 months and to include an objection to
affordable housing and the provision of open space. The Senior Planning Officer
advised that the Housing Enabling Officer would give planning officers a steer
on shared equity and were well placed to negotiate this. The amendment not supported.
Cllr Jon Andrews proposed a refusal on over
development of site and lack of amenities. The proposal was lost.
Cllr Belinda Ridout felt that the issues
raised had now been addressed and therefore saw no justification for refusal
with the added conditions and amended recommendation in place.
Proposed: Cllr Belinda Ridout
Seconded: Cllr Carole Jones
When put to the vote; 4 members voted for
the application and 4 voted against. The
Chairman’s casting vote supported the officers’ amended recommendation
therefore the application was approved.
Decision:
that the application be delegated to the Head of Planning to grant planning
permission subject to Dorset Natural Environment Team’s comments
on the applicant’s Biodiversity Mitigation and Enhancement Plan and subsequent
correction to condition 12, all of the following conditions, and the completion
of a legal agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act
1990 (as amended) in a form to be agreed.
Supporting documents: