To consider the matters within the report and make any comments on the draft Order and recommend the draft Order (as amended) to Cabinet at their meeting on 6 October 2020.
Minutes:
The committee
received a report which summarised the findings from a Dog-related Public Space
Protection Order consultation undertaken between January and May 2020. Informed
by the consultation, the report proposed a draft Dog-related Public Spaces
Protection Order (PSPO) to replace and consolidate existing PSPO’s and byelaws
for the Council area for a period of 3 years.
The Place and Resources Overview Committee were invited to consider the
matters within the report, make any comments on the draft Order and recommend
the draft Order (as amended) to Cabinet at their meeting on 6 October 2020.
The Chairman
highlighted the importance of having a single PSPO for Dorset Council and that
the measures needed to be fair and proportionate to both dog owners and non dog
owners. The consultation drew in views
from a large number and wide range of people and the Chairman thanked all that
had participated. In addition, he noted
representations from the Kennel Club, Guide Dogs for the Blind and assistance
dogs and also reminded members that issues around enforcement were not for
consideration at this meeting.
The Head of
Community and Public Protection noted that officers had worked to consolidate existing
provisions where possible but with an aim to achieve a single PSPO for the
whole Dorset Council area for greater consistency. Some issues raised during the consultation
would be considered as part of the 3 year review of the PSPO and this would include
dog exercise areas on beaches. He
offered his thanks to Mark Simons for his work on the consultation report.
Councillors
considered general issues arising from the report and during discussion the
following points were raised:
·
Councillors
congratulated officers on their work on the successful consultation
exercise. It was noted that consultation
had been extensive and included vets and the RSPCA
·
The
importance of clear signage was highlighted which it was suggested could
include the use of visual mapping, colour coding and detail and what was
allowed and not allowed in a particular areas.
Including a telephone number for reporting incidents and a QR code to
provide access to the council’s website for relevant information were both also
suggested as potential additions to signage
·
It was
noted that officers would be working with town and parish councils to agree the
most appropriate signage for particular areas
·
The
council had the power to place a PSPO on any public land irrespective of
ownership
·
A point
was raised that there was a need to take a balanced approach in this area and
that there should not be a complete ban on dogs being allowed on beaches
·
A
discussion was held in respect of whether timings could be placed on when dogs
could be exercised on a particular area such as a beach when covered by an
exclusion period. It was noted that
there could be an issue with the cleaning of beaches if dogs were allowed
·
Issues
around enforcement were raised and the Head of Community and Public Protection
noted that the use of enforcement resources, including potentially sharing
resources between services, would be looked at over the coming months
·
The
important role of education and awareness raising in this area was recognised
and this would include the use of a social media campaign
·
Reference
was made to restrictions proposed for the Rodwell
Trail in Weymouth and it was noted that as no strong preference had been
expressed during the consultation, officers had looked to maintain the current
provisions in order to strike a balance for different users of the area
·
A
suggestion was made that dog waste bags could be handed out by volunteers at
particular times
·
Health
issues around dog waste were highlighted
·
It was
recognised that the vast majority of dog owners were responsible and that
issues were caused by a minority
·
Reference
was made to the role of dog friendly groups and the example provided of the
group in Weymouth. Councillor Hope
expressed his thanks to this group
·
Issues
around enforcement could be looked at by the Place and Resources Scrutiny Committee.
The committee
discussed the recommendations contained within the report in turn. Comments and recommendations were made as
follows:
Recommendation to Cabinet (including comments where relevant)
Proposed Provisions
a. Clearance of dog fouling and appropriate disposal from public
open spaces. Referenced on page 12 of the consultation report and the
proposed open spaces listed in Schedule 1 of the draft Order. This received
significant support and is a current requirement in all predecessor council
areas.
Recommended for inclusion.
b. Maximum lead length of 2m where required. Referenced on
page 15 of the consultation report and the areas are listed in Schedule 3 of
the draft Order. This received significant support and is a current requirement
of both West Dorset and Weymouth and Portland Councils PSPOs.
Councillors
discussed the proposed restriction on lead length and whilst some councillors
did not want to see a restriction, some comments were also made in support in
having a measure in place, which could be enforced if required.
Upon being put to the vote it was
Recommended for inclusion.
c. Dogs on lead as directed by an authorised officer, maximum lead length 2m. Referenced on page 21 of the
consultation report. This received significant support and is a current
requirement of West Dorset, Weymouth and Portland and North Dorset Councils
PSPOs.
Recommended for inclusion.
d. Dogs on leads, generic locations. Referenced on
page 23 of the consultation report.
All
roadways and footways in areas of vehicle speed limits up to and including
30mph. Whilst
this received significant support there is concern that the enforcement of such
a restriction is difficult, along with very high signage requirements. A
current requirement only of Weymouth & Portland Council PSPO.
Not
recommended for inclusion.
Municipal
cemeteries, church and graveyards, where dog are permitted. Received significant support
and is a current requirement of both West Dorset and Weymouth and Portland
Councils PSPOs.
A
point was raised by one councillor that this could not be supported as it was
felt to be an open space to be used by all.
The
Chairman noted that the provision allowed for dogs on leads in these areas.
Recommended
for inclusion.
Public
formal gardens.
Received significant support and is a current requirement of both West Dorset
and Weymouth and Portland Councils PSPOs.
A
comment was made that some measures were being put in place in order to deal
with the minority causing issues.
Recommended for inclusion.
Council
owned allotments, where permitted. 59% supported the restriction however there was comment
about individual allotments bounded by fencing where dogs could be off-lead.
This would be difficult to enforce having different requirements on the same
land. A current requirement of both West Dorset and Weymouth and Portland Councils
PSPOs.
It
was noted that this measure provided for dogs to be on leads in those
allotments where dogs were permitted.
Recommended
for inclusion.
Council
owned car parks.
Received significant support and a current requirement of some beachside car
parks.
Recommended
for inclusion.
Within
5m of marked sports pitches - 70% supported the restriction. Dog fouling on and around sports
pitches is highly objectionable and a risk to public health. Dogs need to be
under control for owners to remove fouling. Significant support and is a
current requirement of both West Dorset and Weymouth and Portland Councils
PSPOs.
Recommended
for inclusion.
e. Dogs
on leads, specific locations. Referenced on page 35 onwards of the
consultation report.
Rodwell Trail, Weymouth. An urban cycle and footway connecting the outlying wards to
Weymouth town. The responses were divided. Dog owners were less supportive of
dogs being on a lead. Support for the restriction has come from the Police,
Dorset Waste, local dog organisations, Weymouth Town Council, cycling groups
and 60% of the responding residents. This is a very popular location, and it would be more difficult to find
and remove dog fouling if off-lead. A current requirement.
Recommended for
inclusion.
West Bay
Harbour side and Esplanades. Received significant support and is a current requirement.
A question was
raised as to whether specific timings could be applied to this measure.
It was noted that
this was a current requirement and that as this was in relation to roads, car
parks and access routes to the beach, it was felt right that dogs should be on
a lead.
Recommended for inclusion.
Lyme Regis pathways etc. adjacent to the Front/Town Beach. Received significant support
and is a current requirement.
Recommended for inclusion.
Weymouth
Esplanade.
Received significant support and is a current requirement.
Recommended
for inclusion.
Swanage. The Parade and adjacent roads
leading to the Beach. Received significant support and is a current
requirement.
Recommended
for inclusion.
Studland,
access to South Beach and Car Park. Received significant support and is a current requirement.
Recommended
for inclusion.
Studland,
Shell Beach.
58% supported no restriction. However, the land is owned by the National Trust and they have
expressed a view for dogs to be on lead as is the current requirement in
Purbeck DC’s byelaw in order to protect the local habitat. It is therefore
recommended that no change is made to the current position.
Clarification
was sought on the area covered by the provision and the relevant map was
displayed to the committee.
It
was confirmed that the land either side of the road was owned by the National
Trust. Natural England had made a
request for dogs to be kept on leads in order to protect the local habitat.
A
point was made that both the National Trust and Natural England had their own
byelaws and that their request should therefore be met. It was highlighted that this was a world
famous reserve and that dogs should be prevented from going into the area.
It
was noted that 58% of consultee respondents supported no restriction in this
area.
Councillors
discussed the issues arising and reference was made to whether restrictions
could be applied at particular times of the day only and whether signage could
be installed to set out no access areas?
If
respect of signage, a point was made that there were many access points to the
reserve and therefore it was not practical to put notices up at al locations.
The
Portfolio Holder for Customer and Community Services highlighted the importance
of dogs being kept on a lead in the area between the road and the beach. Most species of wildlife in the area lived in
this area. Dogs could then be exercised
off lead on the beach.
With
the consultation responses in mind, a point was made that dogs should be kept
on a lead until they reached the beach.
It was felt that people could understand the difference between the
beach area and the scrubland and that people were capable of understanding
signage directing this.
Councillors
supported dogs being kept on lead in all areas of Studland (including access
roads, car park, pathways and scrubland) with dogs being permitted to be off
lead on the beach.
On
being put to the vote this was Agreed.
The
Chairman asked that officers re-word this part of the recommendation before the
report was submitted to Cabinet on 6 October 2020. Members of the committee to be sent the
updated wording prior to the report being considered.
Charmouth,
Lower Sea Lane Car Parks and surrounding areas leading to the Beach. Received significant support
and is a current requirement.
Recommended
for inclusion.
Charmouth
Beach area - to
either side of the proposed beach exclusion area and extending to the parish
boundary. The exclusion area is marked as red on the map (page 63). This was
requested for inclusion by the Parish Council. 58% supported
no restriction. There is no current requirement for dogs on lead.
It
was noted that this was in relation to areas leading to the beach.
Not
recommended for inclusion.
f. Dog exclusion areas – generic. Referenced on page 65 onwards
of
the consultation report.
Marked
sports pitches and recreation areas – 55% supported exclusion from these areas including the
majority of responding Town and Parish Councils. However, 40%, including the
Police, supported an on-lead restriction as a better provision. On grounds of
public health; public safety and as a current requirement of West Dorset,
Weymouth and Portland and North Dorset Councils PSPOs it is recommended for
inclusion.
Recommended
for inclusion.
Enclosed children’s
play areas –
received significant support and a current requirement in West Dorset, Weymouth
and Portland, North Dorset and some locations in East Dorset.
Recommended
for inclusion
g. Beach restrictions – Referenced on page 71 onwards of the
consultation document.
(Maps are produced to support the Order by clearly
delineating areas where restrictions apply).
Harmonisation of a beach exclusion period - received significant support
with the highest level of support given to 1 May to 30 September
(the shortest exclusion period).
Councillors
considered the dates proposed for the beach exclusion period. In respect of the dates given, it was noted
that a later start date had not been included in the consultation.
A
question was raised as to whether daily timings could be applied in order to
allow dogs at specific times of the day. In response it was noted that in order for a
beach to have a blue flag award, dogs had to be excluded from the beach. This was an important factor for those
beaches that carried the blue flag award or for those hoping to achieve it.
Recommended for inclusion
Swanage,
Central Beach
(931 respondents). Continued exclusion in the current area was supported by 60%
of overall respondents. Many dog owners disagreed and were keen for the
provision of a dog exercise area. The majority of respondents agreed for the
beach to be off-lead outside of the exclusion period.
It is recommended that dogs are excluded from this beach
between 1 May and 30 September and may be exercised off-lead at other times.
Agreed.
Charmouth
Beaches (855
respondents). Beaches East and West of stream and adjoining the Car Park. There is a
current requirement on both beaches for exclusion in the summer period, however
52% of overall respondents did not support this continuing and wanted
unrestricted use of the beach throughout the year. Charmouth Parish Council
have requested some restriction to be placed on the beaches.
It is recommended to include East
Beach (under Evans Cliff) as an exclusion area between 1 May and 30 September
with dog’s exercised off-lead at other times. West Beach to have no
restrictions.
Agreed.
Lyme
Regis, Front/Town Beach (1175 respondents). Significant support received for an exclusion
period. Lyme Regis Town Council indicated that they would prefer an all
year-round exclusion. There is a current requirement for exclusion on the beach
in the summer period and no restriction for the remaining of the year.
There was no clear support for the position to change.
However, there has been significant complaint about dogs being off-lead and the
Town Council would prefer an on-lead restriction for the remainder of the year
on the beach. The adjoining beaches have no restrictions and can be used for
exercise off lead.
It
is recommended that dogs are excluded from this beach between 1 May and 30
September and on-lead at all other times.
Agreed.
Chideock,
Seatown Beach (623 respondents). No majority for exclusion. 56% in favour of
off-lead restriction at all other times. Currently, dogs are excluded all year
as a requirement of the PSPO and at the request of the landowner, The Wraxall Estate. Chideock Parish Council would prefer
exclusion to continue in the summer period.
It
is recommended that dogs are excluded from this beach between 1 May and 30
September and off-lead at all other times.
As
a correction to the information included in the report, it was noted that this
was only a restriction during the summer months and reflected the current
position.
Agreed.
Studland
Beach, also
known as Knoll Beach and Middle Beach (1398 respondents). There is a current
requirement for dogs on-lead at all times but no exclusion period. There was
significant support (70%) for no
exclusion period to continue, furthermore 67% did not want an on-lead
restriction. However, the landowner Natural England would prefer an all year
round on-lead restriction in relation to protection of habitats.
It
is recommended that as currently, there will be no exclusion period but dogs
shall be on-lead at all times.
Councillors
sought clarification on the current position with regard to this area and what
was proposed. Councillors reflected on
the impact of the discussion earlier in the meeting with regard to this area.
The
Chairman asked that officers reworded this provision and that this was sent to
committee members for clarity before the report was considered at Cabinet on 6
October 2020.
West Bay, East
Beach and West Beach (1093 respondents). Currently, there are exclusion periods on both
beaches. A small majority supported an
exclusion on both beaches and did not want a dog on-lead restriction for the
remainder of year. A further question asked if East Beach only should have an
exclusion period. 55% of respondents supported this.
It is recommended that dogs are excluded from East and West
Beaches between 1 May and 30 September and may be exercised off- lead at all
other times.
Agreed.
Weymouth, Central and Greenhill Beaches (1818 respondents). Significant
support for an exclusion period (59%) and exercise area to continue (62%). Majority
of support for dogs to be allowed off-lead outside the exclusion period (as
currently).
Weymouth
Town Council and others have requested a review for the repositioning of the
exercise area further up the beach. It is recommended that a specific proposal
be included in the next consultation.
It is recommended that dogs are excluded from the beach
between 1 May and 30
September and may be exercised off-lead at all other times.
A point of support was noted in respect of the change in
time period.
Agreed.
Supporting documents: