Issue details

Alternative options considered and rejected

The Council can decide not to follow the recommendations of the Examiner, but it must set out its reasons for doing so.  The Council has agreed all of the Examiner’s recommendations made within his report (Appendix A).

Consultees

The plan has been subject to a large amount of public consultation as it has been progressed.

Budget implications

On making a formal decision to progress a neighbourhood plan to referendum, the Council has previously become eligible for a grant of £20,000.  The grant has been intended to cover the costs associated with the Council’s input into the production of a neighbourhood plan including the examination and referendum.  The amount of neighbourhood plan grant support that is available to local planning authorities for the 2024/25 financial year has not been confirmed yet. However, it is anticipated that the previous level of grant support provided will continue. A grant of £20,000 will be sufficient to cover the costs associated with the examination and referendum.

Legal Implications

A legal challenge could theoretically be made against a decision to proceed to referendum. Such a challenge could be made on the basis that the neighbourhood plan, as modified, does not meet the basic conditions, is not compatible with the Convention rights or because it does not comply with the definition of a neighbourhood development plan. However, the independent Examiner has considered these matters in light of all of the comments received during the public consultation and examination period. Given the evidence before them, officers consider that there is no basis for reaching a different view to the Examiner.

Any conflict of interest

None

Reference Documents

Appendix A: Examiner’s Report

Appendix B: Sturminster Marshall Neighbourhood Plan 2023-2033 – Referendum Version.