66 Budget Strategy Report PDF 178 KB
To consider a report of the Portfolio Holder for Finance, Commercial and Capital Assets.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The
Finance, Commercial & Capital Strategy Portfolio Holder presented the Budget strategy and medium-term
financial plan (MTFP). A copy of his
speech is attached as an appendix to these minutes.
The
Chairman invited the Group Leaders to present their replies to the budget
proposals.
Cllrs
Ireland, Sutton and Fry presented their budget speeches which are attached as
appendices to these minutes.
Members
sought re-assurance that borrowing debt would be controlled and discussed the
proposed Council Tax increase.
Generally, the feeling amongst members was that although they did not
want to raise Council Tax, the priority was to maintain services to the
communities they represented and safeguard residents.
The
Finance, Commercial & Capital Strategy Portfolio Holder was confident that
the budget was balanced but still encouraged prudence when committing reserves.
Members
were appreciative of the officer work that had gone into producing the budget
and the opportunity of attending budget cafes, cross party working and input
from the Scrutiny Committees.
Cllr Flower presented his speech as seconder of the budget proposal. Attached as an appendix to the minutes
Proposed
by Cllr Suttle, seconded by Cllr Flower.
In accordance with
procedure rule 19.6 a recorded vote was taken. Those who voted in favour of the
recommendations:-
Cllrs: Adkins,
Alford, Andrews, Barrow, Bartlett, Batstone, Beer, Biggs, Brenton, Brooks,
Brown, Bryan, Carr-Jones, Christopher, Clayton, R. Cook, Coombs, Dunseith,
Ferrari, Flower, Fry, Gibson, Goringe, Gray, Hall, Harrison, Haynes, Heatley,
Holloway, Hughes, Jespersen, S Jones, C Jones, Kerby, Kimber, Lacey-Clarke, H
Legg, Lugg, Miller, Morgan, O’Leary, Orrell, Parker, Parkes, Parry, Penfold,
Pipe, Pothecary, Quale, Rennie, Roberts, Shortell, Somper, Starr, Suttle,
Sutton, Tooke, Trite, Wharf, Wheller and Williams.
Those who voted
against the recommendations:-
Cllrs: Canning, Ezzard, Hope, Ireland, Legg, Roe and Taylor.
Those who
abstained:-
Cllr Tarr
Following a
recorded vote, 61 for, 7 against and 1 abstention the recommendations were
approved.
Decision:
(a) That the revenue budget summarised in
appendix 1, was agreed
(b) That the increase in general council tax
of 1.998% and 0.996% in the
social care precept, providing a band D
council tax figure for Dorset
Council of £1,832.67, an overall increase of
2.994%, was agreed.
(c) That no change to the current scheme of
Local Council Tax Support as set
out in the report, was agreed.
(d) That the
capital strategy set out in Appendix 3 and the capital programme
set out in Appendix
4, was agreed.
(e) That the
treasury management strategy as set out in Appendix 5, was
agreed
(f) That the
assumptions used to develop the budget strategy and medium term financial plan
(MTFP) as set out throughout the report and
summarised in
Appendix 6, was agreed
(g) That the
recommended balances on earmarked reserves and on general
funds, including
the minimum level of the general fund, was agreed
(h) That the
addition of £4.4m from the settlement into the contingency
budget, until there
is clarity around further costs of implementing national
reforms and as a
hedge against emerging cost pressures, was agreed
(i) That the responses to the ... view the full minutes text for item 66
45 Budget Strategy Report PDF 740 KB
To consider a report of the Portfolio Holder for Finance, Commercial and Capital Assets.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Portfolio Holder set out the headlines of the budget including the proposal to set an increase in general council tax of 1.998% and 0.996% in social care precept, providing a band D council tax figure for Dorset Council of £1,832.67; an overall increase of 2.994%. Additional funds of 10.4 million had been awarded to the council from central government. However, he stated that some of this funding had been ring-fenced and any balance not used or ring-fenced should be used as a contingency fund given the current climate and the ongoing pandemic.
The budget proposals had been built around the priorities identified in the Dorset Council Plan and were considered by the Dorset Council Scrutiny Committees on 10 December 2021 and 7 January 2022. The Chairman also stated that all councillors had the opportunity to attend recent budget café meetings so that they could be part of shaping the budget for the forthcoming year.
The following comments and questions were made by non-executive councillors:
· 3% was
the maximum that council tax could be increased without a referendum. We have
one of the highest council tax rates in the country and this was likely to
continue to be so.
· Concern
expressed about future fuel cost increases to residents
· Capital Programme – there is a need to
continue to keep the Council’s capital programme under review in terms of its
affordability and alignment with the Council’s priorities.
In response, the Chairman advised that following the scrutiny meeting he had agreed that a fundamental review of the capital programme would be carried out and this would come back to scrutiny at some point.
There were no additional questions from Cabinet. The Portfolio Holder for Finance, Commercial & Capital Strategy read out his 10 recommendations to full council in respect of the budget strategy.
Cabinet confirmed that their “minded to” view was to support the recommendation.
Recommendation to Full Council from the Portfolio Holder
for Finance, Commercial and Capital Strategy.
(a)
That the revenue budget summarised in appendix 1,
be agreed
(b)
That the increase in general council tax of 1.998%
and 0.996% in the social care precept, providing a band D council tax figure
for Dorset Council of £1,832.67, an overall increase of 2.994%, be agreed.
(c)
That no change to the current scheme of Local
Council Tax Support as set out in the report, be agreed.
(d)
That the capital strategy set out in Appendix 3 and
the capital programme set out in Appendix 4, be agreed.
(e)
That the treasury management strategy as set out in
Appendix 5, be agreed
(f)
That the assumptions used to develop the budget
strategy and medium-term financial plan (MTFP) as set out throughout the report
and summarised in Appendix 6, be agreed
(g) That the recommended balances on ... view the full minutes text for item 45
The scrutiny committee is asked to consider the budget proposals on behalf of the residents of Dorset, and to provide constructive challenge to decision-makers before a final decision is made.
Minutes:
The committee was invited to consider the budget proposals for 2022/23
prior to consideration at Cabinet on 18 January 2022 and Full Council on 15 February
2022. The report gave a summary of progress to date on the budget strategy and
process and provided the opportunity for the scrutiny committees to review
further, budget assumptions and actions being proposed to deliver a balanced
and sustainable budget for 2022/23. In
addition, following the receipt by the council of the provisional local
government finance settlement for 2022/23 on 16 December 2021, a supplement to
the report had been published, which provided an update on various issues.
The Place and Resources Scrutiny Committee had the opportunity to
consider the implications of the proposals on behalf of residents of Dorset and
to provide constructive challenge to decision makers before a final decision
was made. It was noted that the comments made by the committee would be
reported to Cabinet on 18 January 2022 and taken into consideration as part of
the budget setting process.
The Executive Director of Place and Executive Director of Corporate
Development and relevant portfolio holders provided a short introduction to
their budget areas and in addition, the Corporate Director for Finance and
Commercial provided an overview of Central Finance and Capital issues. Following this, councillors discussed the
issues arising.
Further to the
discussion held, the Senior Democratic Services Officer and the Chairman
provided a summary of the key points raised during the discussion in relation
to each area covered by the committee and noted that the points below would be
submitted to Cabinet as part of the budget setting process:
Place
· Fees and Charges – a regular financial report should be presented to the appropriate committee with regard to the monitoring of Dorset Council fees and charges
· Fees and Charges – the Council should further explore and take into account inflation and market rates when setting increases to fees and charges for Council services
· There may be a need for additional resource to progress work around the Dorset Council Climate and Ecological Emergency Strategy and Action Plan. This is linked to the point noted above related to opportunities for securing additional budget from raising fees and charges
· Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Transport Savings – potential risk for the budget is identified in this area. It is noted that further work is to be undertaken and future reporting to councillors will be undertaken through the Council’s transformation project
· Car Parking – the committee wish to flag to Cabinet the potential risk that the new car parking regime (phases 1 and 2) may not generate sufficient income for the Council’s highways management requirements. This needs to be kept under review.
At this point in the meeting, the committee had a five-minute adjournment and returned at 12.51pm. The Chairman held a roll-call of committee members – those present: Councillors S Bartlett, A Canning, J Andrews, M Roberts, D Tooke and B Trite.
It was proposed by J Andrews seconded by M ... view the full minutes text for item 57
The scrutiny committees are asked to consider the budget proposals on behalf of the residents of Dorset, and to provide constructive challenge to decision-makers before a final decision is made.