66 Budget Strategy Report PDF 52 KB
To consider the Budget Strategy Report.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Portfolio Holder for
Finance, Commerical and Assets set out the budget paper for 2020 – 2021. He welcomed the input given to the budget
from the Scrutiny Café event which had been a constructive challenge to the
budget process. He noted the transfer of
additional resources to adults and children’s social care, the movement of
funding from back office to front line services and that the proposals set out
a balanced budget for 2020/21 which supported those in most need in the
community.
Cllr T Ferrari proposed the
budget for 2020 – 2021 and this was seconded by Cllr S Flower.
The Chairman invited Group
Leaders to respond to the budget proposals.
Cllr S Flower noted that it
was a well presented budget which had been brought together with the cross
party involvement of councillors including the key role of the scrutiny
committees. He referred to work already
undertaken to achieve initial convergence and further transformation work to be
undertaken. Although there had been a
need to increase council tax, this would enable investment in adults and
children’s services and the ability to safeguard services. He expressed full support for the budget as
set out in the recommendations presented to Council.
Cllr N Ireland expressed
gratitude that the budget proposals refrained from cutting services. He noted that the report was honest about the
challenges faced by the council but felt that the budget did not cover all
areas that needed to be considered, including funding for the council’s response
to the climate emergency. In particular
he made reference to the use of reserves, the lack of funding from central
government which did not acknowledge the need in social care, social mobility
indicies and noted that residents were being faced with the maximum council tax
increase. He added that he expected the
Leader to engage with all councillors and for there to be ongoing monitoring
and challenge through the scrutiny process.
The Liberal Democrat Group had established a Shadow Cabinet in order to work on and
offer genuine options for consideration.
Cllr L Fry expressed thanks
to all who had worked on the budget and a desire to progress action required.
Cllr C Sutton noted that
since 2010, councils had suffered huge reductions in funding from central
government. She welcomed additional
funding for adult and children’s services and noted that the budget process had
been an inclusive process. She thanked
all staff who had assisted the council but who were no longer with the
council. She noted that the Green Group
would be proposing amendments to the budget and it was felt that the budget
could be more ambitious in the use of reserves.
Cllr P Kimber speaking as an
individual, expressed a level of concern about where the budget was being spent
and made particular reference to issues of deprivation and housing.
The following amendment was
proposed by Cllr C Sutton and seconded by Cllr B Heatley:-
“Change the CPI (Consumer Price Index) inflation assumption underlying the budget ... view the full minutes text for item 66
115 Budget Strategy Report PDF 1 MB
To consider a report of the Portfolio Holder for Finance, Commercial and Assets.
Minutes:
In the absence of
the Portfolio Holder for Finance, Commercial and Assets, the Chairman (Leader
of the Council) presented the Budget Strategy for 2020-2021.
The Chairman
advised that the budget carried forward many aspects of the submitted paper to
the scrutiny committee(s), but had been improved following their
engagement. The Chairman thanked
Scrutiny for their contribution and their constructive challenge to the budget process.
Cabinet was advised
that there was two key focuses that underpinned the budget. The transfer of resources to front line
services, in particular Adult Social Care and Children’s Services. £11.7m had
been added to the expenditure on the most vulnerable adults in the Dorset area
and £10.3m was to be spent on children with care or educational needs.
The budget
increased the council tax burden to residents by just under 4% and this
proposed increase was considered carefully before being presented to members,
but was necessary to meet the needs of Dorset’s most vulnerable residents. The council tax increase provided £9.6m which
was less than half of the extra money allocated to the care services. Members noted that the formation of the
unitary council meant that there would be not cut in services through the
budget presented to members for 2020-2021
The second element
of the budget related to the move of money from back office tasks to front line
services. The creation of the unitary
council had allowed a reduction to central costs, including a slim-lined
leadership team, reduction in councillors and the removal of duplication across
other levels of the organisation. This
rationalising would continue in future years.
In proposing the
recommendation to Full Council, the Chairman advised that this was a balanced
budget that members could have confidence in.
In response to
questions from non-executive councillors, the Executive Director of Corporate
Development explained that there had been minor changes from the figures
presented to the Scrutiny Committee(s) as more details of funding had recently
being announced by Government, in particular details of the New Homes Bonus.
Members noted that there may be some further very minor adjustments to the
final figures to be presented to Full Council on 18 February 2020, to take
account of rounding’s in the calculation of the precept bandings.
Both the Portfolio
Holders for Children, Education and Early Help and Adult Social Care and Health
welcomed the budget; they acknowledged that the Blue Print for Change and other
transforming projects must continue at pace,
in order that the council was able to respond to increasing demand.
However it was also essential that councillors continued to lobby central
government regarding future funding for Dorset.
Members also
welcomed the proposed approach to policy change that was intended to encourage
owners of long-term empty properties to return these to homes of use.
In response to questions, the Executive Director of Corporate Development confirmed that senior officer of the council had been part of the budget process to ensure their departmental budgets were realistic stating that it was important that officers understood budget ... view the full minutes text for item 115