Venue: Stour Hall - The Exchange, Old Market Hill, Sturminster Newton, DT10 1FH. View directions
Contact: Daniel Reynafarje 01202 795054 / Email: daniel.reynafarje@dorsetcouncil.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Declarations of Interest To receive any declarations of interest Minutes: No declarations of disclosable pecuniary interests were made at the meeting. |
|
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 18 June 2019 Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 18 June 2019 were confirmed and signed. |
|
Public Participation There will be no opportunity for Members of the public to speak on a planning application unless proper notification is given to Democratic Services no later than two clear working days before the meeting in accordance with the Guide to Public Speaking at Planning Committee. Minutes: Representations by the public to the Committee on individual planning applications are detailed below. There were no questions, petitions or deputations received on other items on this occasion. |
|
Planning Applications To consider the applications listed below for planning permission Minutes: Members considered written reports submitted on planning applications as set out below. |
|
2/2018/1240/FUL - HUNTLEY DOWN, MILBORNE ST ANDREW PDF 151 KB Erect 25 No. dwellings with garages, form vehicular access Additional documents: Minutes: The
Planning Officer presented the report showing members all of the relevant plans
and drawings. Members of the committee
were advised that as the Milborne St Andrew
Neighbourhood Plan has passed through the examination stage and that a
referendum on the Neighbourhood Plan would take place on 8 August 2019, it was
now considered that moderate weight should be given to the Neighbourhood Plan,
which was a material change to when the application has been considered the by
North Dorset District Council Planning Committee in January 2019. Changes to the National Planning Policy
Framework as set out in the officer’s report also marked a material change to
be considered. The Head of Legal
Services advised the committee of the legal position relating to revisiting the
application in the context of the Neighbourhood Plan; members noted that the
committee would need to have good planning reasons to reverse the view of the
North Dorset Planning Committee which had delegated authority to grant the
application in January. The Planning
Officer also advised the committee of minor typographical errors relating to
the conditions set out in the report,
which would be corrected in the appendix to minutes of the meeting. The
Planning officer highlighted that a previous proposal for the site had been for
30 dwellings and the current application for 25 dwellings was considered to be acceptable
in terms of design and general visual impact with no significant harm to
neighbouring residential amenity. In
addition the committee was advised that the Council could only demonstrate 3.3
years of housing land supply and that the impact on ecology had been addressed
through a Healthland Infrastructure Project. In view of the sustainability merits of the
proposal and the shortfall in the Council’s housing land supply the development
was recommended for approval subject to conditions and a legal agreement to
secure the necessary off-site financial contributions. Public
Participation Oral representations objecting to the planning application were received from, Elizabeth Humphrey, Phillip Bowell, Steve Bulley and Brian Keene. Those objecting to the development stated that the site was surplus to requirement given that the shortage of homes was within the towns and not in the villages, the land could still be used as arable land and the site was outside of the settlement boundary. It was also considered that in view of national planning guidance weight should be given to the Neighbourhood Plan and to approve the application would therefore go against national guidance and local democracy. Concerns were also raised regarding the height of the dwellings in view of the site levels which would impinge on the skyline and the risk around the trees touching the nearby electric cables. Objections were also raised in respect of those with mobility needs due to the slope of the site and the fact that the affordable homes had been located to the least attractive part of the site rather than being pepper potted throughout the development which w as inconsistent with national policy. Objectors also highlighted that the ... view the full minutes text for item 21. |
|
Carry out improvement works to Roman Town House complex to include seating, access, parking, circulation, new timber steps and paths, laying of hard surfaces and other landscaping works Minutes: The
Planning Officer presented the report showing members all of the relevant plans
and drawings. The Planning Officer
reported to the committee a minor error on pages 49 and 63 of the report and
amended the text as follows:- P49: The Dorchester Town Walks are a Grade II
Registered Park & Garden P63: The Dorchester Town Walks are a Grade II
Registered Park & Garden The
committee was advised that the Council’s application was to carry out
improvement works to the site following a consultation exercise, which had included Historic England. The site was located within the towns
historic roman walls and was a hidden gem in Dorchester. The majority of works were to enhance the
entrance to the site and the interpretation boards. Debate Concern was raised
by a member about access to the 7 new parking bays for anyone with a
disability. The Highways Officer confirmed that the barrier to the car parking
was controlled by a barrier system during the week but was accessible over the weekend.
It was also noted that there was
suitable car parking available in close proximity to the site at the front of
County Hall. Concern was also raised in respect of the timing of
the tree planted and a request was made that the trees should be planted
between October and February. The
Planning Officer confirmed that this would request would be taken into account and
details of planting would be agreed and addressed under Condition 5.. In respect of car parking for disabled visitors the
committee requested that the following be points be noted in the minutes:- P52 Disabled car parking spaces and drop off points
will be available immediately adjacent to the site in new and remarked spaces when
the car park is open to the public at weekends P65 Disabled car parking spaces and drop off points
will be available immediately adjacent to the site in new and remarked spaces when
the car park is open to the public at weekends. Decision It
was proposed by Cllr C Jones seconded by Cllr L Fry and agreed that the application
be GRANTED as set out in the
appendix to these minutes. Agreed
of palnning app LB
agreed |
|
Carry out improvement works to Roman Town House complex to include seating, access, parking, circulation, new timber steps and paths, laying of hard surfaces and other landscaping works and relocation of Roman sarcophagus Minutes: The Planning Officer presented the report showing the members all of the relevant plans and drawings. It was proposed by Cllr C Jones seconded by Cllr L Fry that the application be:- GRANTED as set out in
the appendix to these minutes. |
|
WD/D/19/001187 - PIDDLEHINTON CAMP, CHURCH HILL, PIDDLEHINTON PDF 122 KB Installation of Six new pitches comprising 2 No. Double units and 2 No. Single units Minutes: The
Planning Officer presented the report showing members all of the relevant plans
and drawings. It was considered that the
scheme would have considerable social benefits through the provision of an
additional 6 pitches towards the Council’s available supply. Members noted that
no objections had been received from consultees. Amended
wording was suggested for proposed conditions 3 & 4 as set out in the
appendix these minutes. The Chairman reported that the local member Cllr
Gill Haynes was in support of the application. Decision It was proposed by Cllr L Fry seconded by Cllr C Jones
and agreed that the application be:- GRANTED as
set out in the appendix to these minutes. |
|