Use the below search options at the bottom of the page to find information regarding recent decisions that have been taken by the council’s decision making bodies.
Alternatively you can visit the officer decisions page for information on officer delegated decisions that have been taken by council officers.
Reason for Decision
Decision was taken following confirmation that the
Public Space Prevention Order cannot be revoked without consultation and full
council approval. Therefore, it was agreed not to enforce the order at this
time.
Alternative
Options considered and rejected
Alternative
option to enforce was deemed inappropriate given the current lockdown and the
need for people to exercise their dogs near their home.
Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision published: 29/05/2020
Effective from: 06/04/2020
Decision:
Officer
Delegated Decision
Date: 6 April
2020
|
Decision: Enforcement of dogs on Dorset beaches will not be enforced during the
lockdown providing dogs are on leads. The delegation for this decision is
detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution |
Key Decision: Yes |
Reason(s) for Decisions: Decision was taken following confirmation that the Public Space
Prevention Order cannot be revoked without consultation and full council
approval. Therefore, it was agreed not to enforce the order at this time. |
Decision Maker (Name
and Title): John Sellgren,
Executive Director for Place and the Senior Leadership Team |
Alternative options considered
and rejected:
Alternative
option to enforce was deemed inappropriate given the current lockdown and the
need for people to exercise their dogs near their home. |
Any conflict of interest declared by any
member consulted: None |
Any dispensation granted in respect of any
declared conflict of interest: None |
Lead officer: John Sellgren
Reason
for Decision
With
the country in a lockdown situation and limited use of car parks by the public,
charges have been suspended to support key workers to provide services to the
community.
Alternative
Options considered and rejected
None.
Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision published: 29/05/2020
Effective from: 28/03/2020
Decision:
Officer
Delegated Decision
Date: 28 March
2020
|
Decision: Car park charges in all off street car parks
suspended The delegation for this decision is detailed
within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution |
Key Decision: Yes |
Reason(s) for Decisions: With the country
in a lockdown situation and limited use of car parks by the public, charges
have been suspended to support key workers to provide services to the
community. |
Decision Maker (Name
and Title): Senior Leadership
Team |
Alternative options considered
and rejected:
None |
Any conflict of interest declared by any
member consulted: None |
Any dispensation granted in respect of any
declared conflict of interest: |
Lead officer: Matt Prosser
Reason
for Decision
This
move to a digital registration option provides a non-contact solution to the
registration of deaths and may be vital if Dorset experiences a high number of
deaths as a result f the virus.
Alternative
Options considered and rejected
The
suspension of death registration was considered not an option in addition to
the completion in a face-to-face environment.
Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision published: 29/05/2020
Effective from: 27/03/2020
Decision:
Officer
Delegated Decision
Date: 27 March
2020
|
Decision: Decision taken to begin registering deaths over the phone following
the suspension of face-to-face registrations The delegation for this decision is
detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution |
Key Decision: Yes |
Reason(s) for Decisions: This move to a
digital registration option provides a non-contact solution to the
registration of deaths and may be vital if Dorset experiences a high number
of deaths as a result f the virus. |
Decision Maker (Name
and Title): John Sellgren,
Executive Director for Place and the Senior Leadership Team |
Alternative options considered
and rejected:
The suspension of
death registration was considered not an option in addition to the completion
in a fac-to-face environment. |
Any conflict of interest declared by any
member consulted: None |
Any dispensation granted in respect of any
declared conflict of interest: None |
Lead officer: John Sellgren
Reason
for Decision
To
ensure fair recompense as a result of a paid service being suspended.
Alternative
Options considered and rejected
No
action was considered not an option.
Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision published: 29/05/2020
Effective from: 27/03/2020
Decision:
Officer
Delegated Decision
Date: 27 March
2020
|
Decision: If as a result of the Covid-19 epidemic the council is not able to
fulfil a service which is provided on a charged basis it will seek to make
recompense to the customer. At the
discretion of the council this may be through provision of the same service
at a different time, provision of an alternative service of similar benefit
or value, refund of fees or charges, or similar arrangement. The delegation for this decision is
detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution |
Key Decision: Yes |
Reason(s) for Decisions: To ensure fair
recompense as a result of a paid service being suspended |
Decision Maker (Name
and Title): Aidan Dunn,
Executive Director for Corporate Development and the Senior Leadership Team |
Alternative options considered
and rejected:
No action was
considered not an option |
Any conflict of interest declared by any
member consulted: None |
Any dispensation granted in respect of any
declared conflict of interest: None |
Lead officer: Aidan Dunn
Reason
for Decision
Toilets being open
would increase the risk of the virus being transferred and the risk of them
being stripped of consumables due to current shortages in the supermarkets.
Alternative
Options considered and rejected
Opening
toilets would require each to be cleaned on a frequent basis during the day
which is currently not resourced.
Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision published: 29/05/2020
Effective from: 27/03/2020
Decision:
Officer
Delegated Decision
Date: 27 March
2020
|
Decision: Maintain decision that public toilets
are closed. The delegation for this decision is detailed
within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution |
Key Decision: Yes |
Reason(s) for Decisions: Toilets being open would increase the
risk of the virus being transferred and the risk of them being stripped of
consumables due to current shortages in the supermarkets. |
Decision Maker (Name
and Title): John Sellgren,
Executive Director for Place and the Senior Leadership Team |
Alternative options considered
and rejected:
Opening toilets
would require each to be cleaned on a frequent basis during the day which is
currently not resourced. |
Any conflict of interest declared by any
member consulted: None |
Any dispensation granted in respect of any
declared conflict of interest: None |
Lead officer: John Sellgren
Decision
Best Western Hotel
in Weymouth and Best Western in Sherborne agreed for use as temporary care
facilities for 3 months
The delegation for
this decision is detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s
Constitution
Reason
for Decision
The
temporary arrangements enable hospital discharge of people who no longer have a
medical need to be in hospital but need additional support to return home or to
a longer term setting.
Alternative
options considered and rejected
Alternative
option would have resulted in increased capacity in hospitals and limiting the
response to the virus across the system.
Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision published: 29/05/2020
Effective from: 30/03/2020
Decision:
Officer
Delegated Decision
Date: 30 March
2020
|
Decision: Best Western Hotel in Weymouth and
Best Western in Sherborne agreed for use as temporary care facilities for 3
months The delegation for this decision is
detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution |
Key Decision: Yes |
Reason(s) for Decisions: The temporary
arrangements enable hospital discharge of people who no longer have a medical
need to be in hospital but need additional support to return home or to a longer term setting. |
Decision Maker (Name
and Title): Property Cell and
Vivienne Broadhurst, Executive Director for Adults |
Alternative options considered
and rejected:
Alternative
option would have resulted in increased capacity in hospitals and limiting
the response to the virus across the system. |
Any conflict of interest declared by any
member consulted: None |
Any dispensation granted in respect of any
declared conflict of interest: None |
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Vivienne Broadhurst
Decision
Agreed that a single scrutiny panel for
the COVID-19 response would be the most appropriate option at this time
The delegation for this decision is
detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution
Reason for Decision
This enables
officers to balance their time between the active emergency response to
COVID-19 and their responsibility to provide assurance.
Alternative options
included holding more than one scrutiny panel
Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision published: 29/05/2020
Effective from: 08/04/2020
Decision:
Officer
Delegated Decision
Date: 8 April
2020
|
Decision: Agreed that a single scrutiny panel
for the COVID-19 response would be the most appropriate option at this time The delegation for this decision is
detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution |
Key Decision: Yes |
Reason(s) for Decisions: This enables
officers to balance their time between the active emergency response to
COVID-19 and their responsibility to provide assurance. |
Decision Maker (Name
and Title): Jonathan Mair,
Corporate Director for Legal and Democratic and the Senior Leadership Team |
Alternative options considered
and rejected:
Alternative
options included holding more than one scrutiny panel |
Any conflict
of interest declared by any member consulted: None |
Any dispensation granted in respect of any
declared conflict of interest: None |
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Jonathan Mair
There are no
alterative options as the appointment of an independent examiner is a legal
requirement.
Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision published: 07/04/2020
Effective from: 07/04/2020
Decision:
Decision
The appointment of
an independent examiner for the examination of the Milton Abbas neighbourhood
development plan.
Reason for decision
The appointment of an independent examiner is a legal requirement of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Localism Act 2011 once a neighbourhood plan has been submitted to the Council.
Wards affected: Puddletown and Lower Winterborne;
Lead officer: Hilary Jordan
There are no
alterative options as the appointment of an independent examiner is a legal
requirement.
Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision published: 07/04/2020
Effective from: 07/04/2020
Decision:
Decision
The appointment of
an independent examiner for the examination of the Shaftesbury neighbourhood
development plan.
Reason for
Decision
The appointment of
an independent examiner is a legal requirement of the Town and Country Planning
Act 1990 as amended by Localism Act 2011 once a neighbourhood plan has been
submitted to the Council.
Wards affected: Shaftesbury Town;
Lead officer: Hilary Jordan
Reason for Decision
Changes take account of:
i.
Consideration of the supplementary planning
document by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council at Cabinet and Council
Meetings following Dorset Council’s Cabinet Meeting;
ii.
Emerging Dorset Heathlands Planning Framework
Supplementary Planning Document.
Alternative options considered
Refer back to the council’s cabinet for
re-consideration, not pursued as:
i.
the council’s cabinet granted delegated
authority (to Executive
Director for Place in consultation with the Portfolio Holder for Planning) to
agree textual changes, or
amendments, to the supplementary planning document;
and
ii.
the nature of the changes (summarised in
Table 1) are not considered to be significant for local communities.
Consultees
Officers at Bournemouth, Christchurch and
Poole Council.
Decision Maker: Portfolio Holder for Planning
Decision published: 01/04/2020
Effective from: 01/04/2020
Decision:
Decision
To agree changes (the post cabinet meeting of the 10th December 2019) as set out in Table 1 (appended to this Notice).
Not to lease this particular property
Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision
Decision published: 30/03/2020
Effective from: 30/03/2020
Decision:
To lease flat 8 Tilly Whin Swanage under the direct leasing scheme for homeless households.
Wards affected: Swanage;
Lead officer: Sarah How