Decisions

Use the below search options at the bottom of the page to find information regarding recent decisions that have been taken by the council’s decision making bodies.

Alternatively you can visit the officer decisions page for information on officer delegated decisions that have been taken by council officers.

Decisions published

06/04/2020 - **Dogs on Beaches ref: 339    Recommendations Approved

Reason for Decision

 

Decision was taken following confirmation that the Public Space Prevention Order cannot be revoked without consultation and full council approval. Therefore, it was agreed not to enforce the order at this time.

 

 

Alternative Options considered and rejected

 

Alternative option to enforce was deemed inappropriate given the current lockdown and the need for people to exercise their dogs near their home.

 

Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision

Decision published: 29/05/2020

Effective from: 06/04/2020

Decision:

Officer Delegated Decision

 

Date: 6 April 2020

Decision:

 

Enforcement of dogs on Dorset beaches will not be enforced during the lockdown providing dogs are on leads.

 

The delegation for this decision is detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution

 

Key Decision:

Yes

Reason(s) for Decisions:

 

Decision was taken following confirmation that the Public Space Prevention Order cannot be revoked without consultation and full council approval. Therefore, it was agreed not to enforce the order at this time.

 

Decision Maker (Name and Title):

 

John Sellgren, Executive Director for Place and the Senior Leadership Team

 

Alternative options considered and rejected:

 

Alternative option to enforce was deemed inappropriate given the current lockdown and the need for people to exercise their dogs near their home.

 

 

Any conflict of interest declared by any member consulted:

 

None

 

Any dispensation granted in respect of any declared conflict of interest:

 

None

 


 

Lead officer: John Sellgren


28/03/2020 - **Car Parks Charges ref: 338    Recommendations Approved

Reason for Decision

 

With the country in a lockdown situation and limited use of car parks by the public, charges have been suspended to support key workers to provide services to the community.

 

 

Alternative Options considered and rejected

 

None.

Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision

Decision published: 29/05/2020

Effective from: 28/03/2020

Decision:

Officer Delegated Decision

 

Date: 28 March 2020

Decision:

 

Car park charges in all off street car parks suspended

 

 

The delegation for this decision is detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution

 

Key Decision:

Yes

Reason(s) for Decisions:

 

With the country in a lockdown situation and limited use of car parks by the public, charges have been suspended to support key workers to provide services to the community.

 

 

Decision Maker (Name and Title):

 

Senior Leadership Team

 

Alternative options considered and rejected:

 

None

Any conflict of interest declared by any member consulted:

 

None

 

Any dispensation granted in respect of any declared conflict of interest:

 

 

 

 

 


 

Lead officer: Matt Prosser


27/03/2020 - **Registration of Deaths ref: 337    Recommendations Approved

Reason for Decision

 

This move to a digital registration option provides a non-contact solution to the registration of deaths and may be vital if Dorset experiences a high number of deaths as a result f the virus.

 

 

Alternative Options considered and rejected

 

The suspension of death registration was considered not an option in addition to the completion in a face-to-face environment.

 

Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision

Decision published: 29/05/2020

Effective from: 27/03/2020

Decision:

Officer Delegated Decision

 

Date: 27 March 2020

Decision:

 

Decision taken to begin registering deaths over the phone following the suspension of face-to-face registrations

 

The delegation for this decision is detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution

 

Key Decision:

Yes

Reason(s) for Decisions:

 

This move to a digital registration option provides a non-contact solution to the registration of deaths and may be vital if Dorset experiences a high number of deaths as a result f the virus.

 

Decision Maker (Name and Title):

 

John Sellgren, Executive Director for Place and the Senior Leadership Team

 

Alternative options considered and rejected:

 

The suspension of death registration was considered not an option in addition to the completion in a fac-to-face environment.

 

Any conflict of interest declared by any member consulted:

 

None

 

Any dispensation granted in respect of any declared conflict of interest:

 

None

 


 

Lead officer: John Sellgren


27/03/2020 - **Refunds and Compensation ref: 336    Recommendations Approved

Reason for Decision

 

To ensure fair recompense as a result of a paid service being suspended.

 

 

Alternative Options considered and rejected

 

No action was considered not an option.

 

Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision

Decision published: 29/05/2020

Effective from: 27/03/2020

Decision:

Officer Delegated Decision

 

Date: 27 March 2020

Decision:

 

If as a result of the Covid-19 epidemic the council is not able to fulfil a service which is provided on a charged basis it will seek to make recompense to the customer.  At the discretion of the council this may be through provision of the same service at a different time, provision of an alternative service of similar benefit or value, refund of fees or charges, or similar arrangement.

 

The delegation for this decision is detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution

 

Key Decision:

Yes

Reason(s) for Decisions:

 

To ensure fair recompense as a result of a paid service being suspended

 

 

Decision Maker (Name and Title):

 

Aidan Dunn, Executive Director for Corporate Development and the Senior Leadership Team

 

Alternative options considered and rejected:

 

No action was considered not an option

 

 

Any conflict of interest declared by any member consulted:

 

None

 

Any dispensation granted in respect of any declared conflict of interest:

 

None

 


 

Lead officer: Aidan Dunn


27/03/2020 - **Public Toilets ref: 335    Recommendations Approved

Reason for Decision

 

Toilets being open would increase the risk of the virus being transferred and the risk of them being stripped of consumables due to current shortages in the supermarkets.

 

 

Alternative Options considered and rejected

 

Opening toilets would require each to be cleaned on a frequent basis during the day which is currently not resourced.

 

Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision

Decision published: 29/05/2020

Effective from: 27/03/2020

Decision:

Officer Delegated Decision

 

Date: 27 March 2020

Decision:

 

Maintain decision that public toilets are closed.

The delegation for this decision is detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution

 

Key Decision:

Yes

Reason(s) for Decisions:

 

Toilets being open would increase the risk of the virus being transferred and the risk of them being stripped of consumables due to current shortages in the supermarkets.

 

Decision Maker (Name and Title):

 

John Sellgren, Executive Director for Place and the Senior Leadership Team

 

 

Alternative options considered and rejected:

 

Opening toilets would require each to be cleaned on a frequent basis during the day which is currently not resourced.

 

 

Any conflict of interest declared by any member consulted:

 

None

 

 

Any dispensation granted in respect of any declared conflict of interest:

 

None

 


 

Lead officer: John Sellgren


30/03/2020 - **Care Hotel ref: 343    Recommendations Approved

Decision

Best Western Hotel in Weymouth and Best Western in Sherborne agreed for use as temporary care facilities for 3 months

 

The delegation for this decision is detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution

 

Reason for Decision

The temporary arrangements enable hospital discharge of people who no longer have a medical need to be in hospital but need additional support to return home or to a longer term setting.

 

Alternative options considered and rejected

Alternative option would have resulted in increased capacity in hospitals and limiting the response to the virus across the system.

 

Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision

Decision published: 29/05/2020

Effective from: 30/03/2020

Decision:

Officer Delegated Decision

 

Date: 30 March 2020

Decision:

 

Best Western Hotel in Weymouth and Best Western in Sherborne agreed for use as temporary care facilities for 3 months

 

The delegation for this decision is detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution

 

 

Key Decision:

Yes

Reason(s) for Decisions:

 

The temporary arrangements enable hospital discharge of people who no longer have a medical need to be in hospital but need additional support to return home or to a longer term setting.

 

 

Decision Maker (Name and Title):

 

Property Cell and Vivienne Broadhurst, Executive Director for Adults

 

Alternative options considered and rejected:

 

Alternative option would have resulted in increased capacity in hospitals and limiting the response to the virus across the system.

 

 

Any conflict of interest declared by any member consulted:

 

None

 

Any dispensation granted in respect of any declared conflict of interest:

 

None

 

 

 

Wards affected: (All Wards);

Lead officer: Vivienne Broadhurst


08/04/2020 - **Scrutiny Panel ref: 340    Recommendations Approved

Decision

Agreed that a single scrutiny panel for the COVID-19 response would be the most appropriate option at this time

The delegation for this decision is detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution

 

Reason for Decision

This enables officers to balance their time between the active emergency response to COVID-19 and their responsibility to provide assurance.

 

Alternative options considered and rejected:

Alternative options included holding more than one scrutiny panel

 

 

Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision

Decision published: 29/05/2020

Effective from: 08/04/2020

Decision:

Officer Delegated Decision

 

Date: 8 April 2020

Decision:

 

Agreed that a single scrutiny panel for the COVID-19 response would be the most appropriate option at this time

The delegation for this decision is detailed within the Scheme of Delegation in the Council’s Constitution

 

Key Decision:

Yes

Reason(s) for Decisions:

 

This enables officers to balance their time between the active emergency response to COVID-19 and their responsibility to provide assurance.

 

 

Decision Maker (Name and Title):

 

Jonathan Mair, Corporate Director for Legal and Democratic and the Senior Leadership Team

 

Alternative options considered and rejected:

 

Alternative options included holding more than one scrutiny panel

 

Any conflict of interest declared by any member consulted:

 

None

 

Any dispensation granted in respect of any declared conflict of interest:

 

None

 

 

 

Wards affected: (All Wards);

Lead officer: Jonathan Mair


07/04/2020 - Milton Abbas Neighbourhood Plan ref: 286    Recommendations Approved

There are no alterative options as the appointment of an independent examiner is a legal requirement.

Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision

Decision published: 07/04/2020

Effective from: 07/04/2020

Decision:

Decision

The appointment of an independent examiner for the examination of the Milton Abbas neighbourhood development plan.

 

Reason for decision

The appointment of an independent examiner is a legal requirement of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Localism Act 2011 once a neighbourhood plan has been submitted to the Council.

Wards affected: Puddletown and Lower Winterborne;

Lead officer: Hilary Jordan


07/04/2020 - Shaftesbury Neighbourhood Local Plan ref: 285    Recommendations Approved

There are no alterative options as the appointment of an independent examiner is a legal requirement.

 

Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision

Decision published: 07/04/2020

Effective from: 07/04/2020

Decision:

Decision

The appointment of an independent examiner for the examination of the Shaftesbury neighbourhood development plan.

 

Reason for Decision

The appointment of an independent examiner is a legal requirement of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Localism Act 2011 once a neighbourhood plan has been submitted to the Council.

 

Wards affected: Shaftesbury Town;

Lead officer: Hilary Jordan


01/04/2020 - Post cabinet changes to Poole Harbour Recreation 2019 - 2024 Supplementary Planning Document ref: 284    Recommendations Approved

Reason for Decision

Changes take account of:

            i.        Consideration of the supplementary planning document by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council at Cabinet and Council Meetings following Dorset Council’s Cabinet Meeting;

          ii.        Emerging Dorset Heathlands Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document.

 

Alternative options considered

Refer back to the council’s cabinet for re-consideration, not pursued as:

i.              the council’s cabinet granted delegated authority (to Executive Director for Place in consultation with the Portfolio Holder for Planning) to agree textual changes, or amendments, to the supplementary planning document; and

ii.            the nature of the changes (summarised in Table 1) are not considered to be significant for local communities.

 

Consultees

Officers at Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council.

 

 

 

 

Decision Maker: Portfolio Holder for Planning

Decision published: 01/04/2020

Effective from: 01/04/2020

Decision:

Decision

To agree changes (the post cabinet meeting of the 10th December 2019) as set out in Table 1 (appended to this Notice).


30/03/2020 - Lease of Flat, Swanage ref: 283    Recommendations Approved

Decision
Housing the Homeless under

 

 

Alternative options considered and rejected:

Not to lease this particular property

 

Decision Maker: Officer Delegated Decision

Decision published: 30/03/2020

Effective from: 30/03/2020

Decision:

To lease flat 8 Tilly Whin Swanage under the direct leasing scheme for homeless households.

Wards affected: Swanage;

Lead officer: Sarah How