27 Budget and Medium-Term Financial Plan Strategy Report (MTFP)
PDF 1 MB
To consider a report of the Cabinet Member for Finance and Capital Strategy.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for Finance & Capital Strategy presented the
Budget and Medium-Term Financial Plan Strategy report for recommendation to
Full Council.
In setting out the report and its recommendations, the Cabinet Member for Finance and Capital
Strategy gave a wider overview of the context influencing the Council’s
financial position. He highlighted that Dorset, as a predominantly rural county
with a significantly aging population, continued to face challenges which were
not fully reflected in national funding allocations. Also, the Council received
comparatively less transport support than neighbouring authorities, and the
area’s seasonal economy contributed to younger residents leaving the county in
search of stable employment.
The Cabinet Member
continued that the introduction of a three‑year financial settlement was
welcomed; however, in real terms Dorset would see a reduction of £6 million
over that period. He explained that business rates have fallen by 15%, and this
financial backdrop contributed to the need for a 4.99% increase in council tax,
which, while disappointing, was presented as a direct consequence of the
national approach to funding distribution and its impact on Dorset.
The Cabinet Member acknowledged the contributions of the budget cafés,
and the recommendations and comments from the Scrutiny Committees; and these
along with the responses were set out in Appendix 9 to the report (circulated
as a supplement).
Non-Cabinet members asked several questions around Adult Social Care and
Children Services. There was also frustration
expressed regarding the government’s settlement, and it was hoped that the Council
would continue to apply pressure on central government for improved funding.
Members welcomed the introduction of the budget simulator and expressed a
hope that it would be utilised again next year.
Before the recommendations were put to the vote, individual Cabinet members
were given an opportunity to draw attention to how the budget specifically
impacted their portfolio areas, and the steps being taken to manage financial
pressures through efficiencies while continuing to support vulnerable residents
and essential infrastructure.
Cllr S Clifford proposed the recommendations 1 to 13 of the report and
these were seconded by Cllr S Robinson.
Recommendation to Full Council
1.
That the revenue budget
summarised in Appendix 1 of the report to Cabinet of 29 January 2026, be
agreed.
2.
That the increase in
general Council Tax of 2.9985% and 1.9919% in the Social Care Precept,
providing a Band D Council Tax figure for Dorset Council of £2,205.90; an
overall increase of 4.9904%, be agreed and that the Council Tax resolution in
Appendix 2 be agreed.
3.
That the Council Tax base
of 163,765.1 and Band D equivalents (188,374 households in total) agreed by the
Section 151 Officer earlier in this budget setting process, be noted.
4.
That the continuation of
the unchanged scheme of Local Council Tax Support, and the revised income
tables following the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) uplift of benefits
by 3.8%, be noted.
5.
That the Capital Strategy
set out in Appendix 7, be agreed.
6. That the “standing items” included with the Capital Programme as ... view the full minutes text for item 27
54 Medium Term Financial Plan and Budget Strategy report
PDF 110 KB
To consider a report by the Corporate Director for Finance and Commercial (Section 151 Officer).
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Corporate Director for Finance and Commercial (Section
151 Officer) introduced the Budget and Medium-Term Financial Plan (MTFP). The
proposed net revenue budget for 2026/27 was £482.6m. The underlying cost
pressure was approximately £37m, the pressures in the proposed budget were
addressed through a range of efficiencies, savings, grants and income. The proposed
budget presented a balanced budget to the council.
The Committee discussed the report and asked questions of
the Section 151 Officer, Cabinet Members, and relevant directors. Non-committee
members were also given the opportunity to ask questions. Each of the
appendices relevant to the committee’s remit were discussed in-turn, following
an introduction from the senior officer responsible for the service.
Appendix 1d – Adults and Housing
The demand in adult social care was predicted to continue
rising, although it was not expected to increase above the growth included in
the budget. Pressures on the wider system could create pressure on the budget.
Savings were to be achieved during the year.
The following points were raised during discussion on the
Adults and Housing budget:
·
Whether the FutureCare savings target was
realistic. The Executive Director for Adults and Housing was very confident for
that these savings would be made.
·
A 3% vacancy factor was expected to be built
into the budget. Recruitment for social workers was a challenge but vacancies
for these posts were not deliberately held.
·
The unfunded staffing posts pressure in housing
were being extended into this financial year as they were on a 2-year basis but
were needed to continue investment and transformation in housing.
·
With regards to the council’s transport offer
and making savings, the Executive Director advised the council was looking at
more cost-efficient ways of funding this, such as using more direct payments.
Appendix 1e – Children’s Services
There was a 5.7% increase in the Children’s Services budget
with £3.5m of pressures from pay increases and inflation. The largest pressure
was the children in care placement budget. The budget included a £1.5m
investment into fostering and kinship care, which was the least expensive
option for children in care.
The following points were raised during the Children’s
Services budget discussion:
·
There was a concern from the committee about the
council’s High Needs Block deficit. The Section 151 Officer advised this was a
national issue and the government planned to introduce a SEND white paper which
would set out policy reform options. The council was managing SEND well and
there may be additional funding in the final settlement.
·
A specific timeline was not attached to the
introduction of AI. Additional capacity from remodelling the service, along
with using AI to support staff, would mean the council does not need to rely on
agency staff. The Transformation Management Office were reviewing the options
for the implementation of AI.
Appendix 1f – Birth to Settled Adulthood
There had been significant growth in the budget for Birth to Settled Adulthood to reflect the service need. The service should help prevent growth in need and supporting children to stay with ... view the full minutes text for item 54